Within UFO Hackers
When Classified Technology Looks Extraterrestrial
Secret aircraft and defence projects can produce unusual sightings and rumours that later become attached to extraterrestrial explanations.
On this page
- How secrecy creates information gaps
- Misidentified aircraft and programmes
- Why rumours persist after declassification
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Classified aircraft and defence programmes can create genuine UFO mysteries without involving extraterrestrial technology. Witnesses may see an unfamiliar shape, altitude or flight pattern, while officials who know the explanation are unable—or unwilling—to disclose it. The result is an information gap in which an advanced but human-made system can be interpreted as something beyond human engineering.
Several declassified programmes show this mechanism clearly. High-altitude U-2 reconnaissance flights produced reports of brilliant objects above ordinary air traffic; the A-12 OXCART flew faster and higher than publicly acknowledged aircraft; Project Mogul concealed unusual balloon equipment; and the F-117 stealth fighter operated for years before the public saw an accurate photograph. Yet this explanation has limits. It does not follow that every unresolved sighting was a secret aircraft, and official claims about the proportion explained by classified programmes are sometimes broader than the published evidence can firmly support.[cia.gov]cia.govDOC 0005517742CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo…
How secrecy creates information gaps
A classified programme divides observers into groups with radically different knowledge. Engineers, pilots and security staff may understand the system but be prohibited from discussing it. Air-traffic personnel, local military units and civilian witnesses may see only fragments: an unexpected radar return, an aircraft without conventional lights, a bright object at extraordinary altitude or activity around a restricted test range.
Compartmentalisation can produce the same problem inside government. Personnel investigating an unidentified sighting may lack access to the programme responsible for it. A truthful answer may therefore remain unavailable even to an official inquiry. The All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, concluded in its 2024 historical review that some reports and later allegations arose when people encountered authentic national-security programmes but were not informed of their real purpose. It also found instances in which references to sensitive terrestrial technology were subsequently interpreted as evidence of hidden extraterrestrial projects.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUMEDepartment of WarAARO Historical Record Report Volume 1March 9, 2024 — 8 Mar 2024 — CIA official was not involved in the movement of extr…
Secrecy also changes the behaviour of authorities. A defence organisation may prefer an inconclusive UFO explanation to confirmation that a new surveillance platform exists. During the Cold War, acknowledging the true cause of a sighting could reveal operating altitudes, testing locations, deployment schedules or sensor capabilities to a rival power. Officials therefore had a security incentive to let witnesses remain mistaken, even when they did not actively promote an alien explanation. The CIA’s historical account says Air Force officers sometimes gave misleading or incomplete explanations for U-2 sightings because they could not reveal the reconnaissance programme.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo…
This produces an important distinction. A government may conceal a real event without concealing extraterrestrial contact. The concealed fact might be that an experimental aircraft was overhead, that a surveillance balloon had fallen, or that a test range was operating a platform whose existence remained classified. To an outsider, both situations generate the same visible signs: evasive statements, missing records, restricted locations and delayed disclosure.
Aircraft that looked impossible at the time
The strongest cases are not speculative designs but programmes whose existence, performance and secrecy were later documented.
The U-2 reconnaissance aircraft began secret operations in the 1950s at altitudes far above most contemporary air traffic. At cruising height, a U-2 could remain illuminated by sunlight after the ground below had entered darkness. From an airliner or from the ground, it could appear as an unusually bright, slow-moving object where witnesses did not expect an aircraft to be. Investigators with access to flight information could recognise the cause, but the programme’s sensitivity prevented a candid public explanation.[CIA]cia.govDOC 0005517742CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo…
The A-12 OXCART deepened the problem. Developed by the CIA and Lockheed as a successor to the U-2, it exceeded Mach 3 and operated above 90,000 feet—performance that lay far outside ordinary public experience. Its first test flight from Groom Lake took place in April 1962, but details of the aircraft and its base remained tightly protected. A high, fast object with an unfamiliar profile could therefore be accurately observed yet incorrectly classified by a witness who lacked the necessary frame of reference.[cia.gov]cia.govarea 51 and the accidental test flightArea 51 and the Accidental Test Flight6 Aug 2015 — The first flight test of the CIA's A-12 OXCART took place at the Groom Lake facilit…
CIA histories have stated that U-2 and OXCART activity accounted for more than half of UFO reports during parts of the late 1950s and 1960s. That figure is often repeated as proof that secret aircraft explain most classic sightings. It should be treated cautiously. The programmes clearly generated sightings, but critics have questioned whether the surviving records justify such a precise and sweeping percentage. The defensible conclusion is narrower: classified reconnaissance flights were a significant source of reports, not a universal explanation for everything left unidentified.[CIA]cia.govask molly what really went on at area 51ask molly what really went on at area 51
The F-117 Nighthawk demonstrates how long a radical aircraft can operate without public recognition. The angular stealth fighter first flew in 1981, trained from the remote Tonopah Test Range and remained officially classified until November 1988. Its unit used a cover arrangement involving A-7 aircraft, while much F-117 flying occurred at night. To an observer unfamiliar with faceted stealth design, the aircraft’s shape, lighting and restricted-range operations could appear more exotic than they were.[af.mil]osi.af.milNighthawk helps shape PJ legacyNighthawk helps shape PJ legacy
The F-117 case also reveals why eyewitness descriptions do not always match a later-revealed aircraft neatly. Night viewing erases scale and surface detail. Navigation lights can create a triangular or disconnected pattern, while perspective can make a banking aircraft appear stationary. A witness may therefore describe a dark triangle or a group of lights rather than the exact outline visible in a museum photograph.
Not every unusual secret aircraft was operationally successful. The VZ-9AV Avrocar, developed with US military support during the 1950s, was a circular vertical-flight vehicle that genuinely resembled the flying saucers of contemporary popular culture. It proved unstable close to the ground and failed to achieve its intended performance, but its existence is a reminder that “saucer-shaped military craft” is not inherently a contradiction. Some human designers really did test machines with forms that the public associated with extraterrestrial visitors.[Air Force Museum]nationalmuseum.af.milOpen source on af.mil.
Roswell and the secrecy around Project Mogul
Roswell is the clearest example of an ordinary-looking official explanation becoming suspicious because it concealed a more sensitive programme. In July 1947, personnel from Roswell Army Air Field announced that they had recovered a “flying disc”, then rapidly replaced that statement with an explanation involving a weather balloon. The reversal helped create the impression that authorities had withdrawn the truth after revealing too much.
The US Air Force’s later investigation concluded that the debris was associated with Project Mogul, a classified effort using high-altitude balloon trains and acoustic equipment to detect evidence of Soviet nuclear tests. The materials were terrestrial, but the mission was too sensitive to disclose in 1947. A mundane cover description therefore protected a real intelligence programme while leaving inconsistencies that later became central to alien-crash narratives.[defense.gov]media.defense.govAFD 101027 030AFD 101027 030
This explanation remains disputed within UFO literature, particularly where later accounts mention bodies or a recovered craft. The Air Force argued that many body stories had become entangled with later military accidents and anthropomorphic dummy tests rather than the original 1947 debris recovery. Because these recollections emerged across different periods and sometimes combined separate events, Roswell illustrates another effect of delayed disclosure: once decades have passed, a declassified programme must compete with accumulated testimony, folklore and reconstructed memory.[U.S. Air Force]af.milOpen source on af.mil.
Project Mogul does not prove that all Roswell testimony is false, but it provides a documented reason for the initial concealment. That matters because it explains how officials could issue misleading statements without possessing an alien spacecraft. The secrecy was real; the disputed point is what the secrecy protected.
When a secret-aircraft theory becomes another rumour
Once the existence of programmes such as the U-2 or F-117 is established, it is tempting to assign every difficult case to a still-classified successor. This can turn “secret aircraft” into an unfalsifiable explanation almost as flexible as the extraterrestrial hypothesis.
The 1990 Calvine photographs from Scotland show the problem. Two witnesses reportedly photographed a large diamond-shaped object with a Harrier nearby. Ministry of Defence material confirms that officials examined the case and prepared press lines, while the surviving image has prompted suggestions ranging from a hoax or reflection to an experimental US aircraft. No identified programme has been conclusively matched to the object, however, and the original witnesses and negatives remain unavailable. Calling it a secret aircraft is therefore a hypothesis, not a declassification-supported solution.[National Archives]cdn.nationalarchives.gov.ukOpen source on nationalarchives.gov.uk.
A useful credibility test is whether the proposed programme explains the whole observation rather than merely resembling one feature. A convincing identification should fit the date, location, operating altitude, apparent speed, duration and known testing history. It should also account for why the craft would be present there. A vague claim that “the military must have something advanced” cannot by itself explain hovering, extreme acceleration or an object seen at close range.
The same caution applies in reverse. An unresolved report is not positive evidence of extraterrestrial technology. It may remain unresolved because the observation was brief, sensor data were incomplete or a relevant programme is still protected. NASA and AARO both stress that unidentified means the available information does not yet permit a reliable attribution; it is not a conclusion about origin.[nasa.gov]science.nasa.govScience UAP FAQsScience UAP FAQs
Why rumours survive declassification
Declassification rarely arrives as a single, complete revelation. Documents may be released decades apart, with technical details removed and records missing. The public learns enough to confirm that secrecy existed but not always enough to reconstruct exactly which flight, balloon or test caused a particular sighting. That partial confirmation can strengthen suspicion rather than settle it.
The passage of time creates further problems. Witness memories evolve, stories merge and later technology changes how earlier descriptions are interpreted. A report of a bright light may be retold as a structured craft; an unfamiliar aircraft becomes a silent triangle; a balloon recovery becomes a crash operation. When the responsible programme is finally disclosed, believers may view it as a cover story invented to replace the extraterrestrial explanation rather than as the original reason for secrecy.
Official overstatement can make this worse. Claims that secret aircraft explain a large fraction of historical UFO reports may be broadly plausible but difficult for outsiders to audit case by case. When authorities present a strong numerical conclusion without releasing the matching flight records and investigative files, scepticism is predictable. Excessive classification therefore carries a long-term policy cost: it protects immediate capabilities while weakening confidence in later explanations.
Deliberate misinformation presents an even greater risk. AARO’s historical work found that some people who believed they had encountered alien-related projects had instead been exposed to stories, imagery or language associated with authentic classified programmes. Whatever the original security purpose, planting extraordinary explanations can outlive the programme and be repeated sincerely by personnel who think they received privileged information.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUMEDepartment of WarAARO Historical Record Report Volume 1March 9, 2024 — 8 Mar 2024 — CIA official was not involved in the movement of extr…
A better policy for protecting secrets without feeding myths
Defence secrecy cannot be eliminated. Revealing the existence or performance of an experimental platform too early may expose capabilities, vulnerabilities or intelligence methods. The practical question is how to protect those details without creating preventable decades-long mysteries.
A better approach would separate immediate operational secrecy from permanent historical silence. Governments could preserve sealed records linking unusual reports to classified tests, including dates, broad locations and the authority responsible for later review. Once the programme no longer requires protection, investigators could release a case-level explanation without disclosing technical information that remains sensitive.
Independent oversight is equally important. A designated body with access across compartments can determine whether an incident corresponds to a domestic programme while providing investigators with a limited finding such as “identified national-security activity” rather than a false conventional explanation. This reduces the risk that one branch of government genuinely investigates a phenomenon caused by another branch but is denied the information needed to resolve it.
Public statements should also distinguish among three outcomes: positively identified classified activity, probable but unconfirmed human technology, and genuinely unresolved observations. Treating these categories as interchangeable encourages both blanket debunking and exaggerated alien claims. AARO’s review supports the conclusion that misidentified classified programmes form a real case family, but it does not establish that every unexplained report belongs within it.[AARO]aaro.milAARO Historical Record Report VolAARO_Historical_Record_Repor…6 Mar 2024 — AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentifi…
For readers assessing claims connected with UFO hackers such as Gary McKinnon, this distinction is crucial. The existence of classified aerospace programmes makes searches for hidden files psychologically understandable, because governments have repeatedly concealed remarkable human technology. It does not validate claims of recovered alien craft. The historical record instead shows a more complicated pattern: real secrecy, authentic advanced systems, incomplete explanations and rumours that can persist long after the technology itself is no longer secret.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to When Classified Technology Looks Extraterrestrial. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Skunk Works: A Personal Memoir of My Years at Lockheed
The former head of Lockheed's SKUNK WORKS reveals the amazing story of the secret aircraft that changed the course of history - from the...
Area 51: An Uncensored History of America's Top Secret Milita...
The explosive, untold story of the Cold War's biggest secret from the bestselling author of NUCLEAR WAR: A SCENARIO 'An extraordinary boo...
Dark Eagles: A History of Top Secret U.S. Aircraft Programs
An aviation historian tells the story of the "Dark Eagles," airplanes that the US government developed, tested, and operated in deepest s...
The CIA and the U-2 Program
A comprehensive & authoritative history of the CIA's manned overhead reconnaissance program (MORP), which from 1954 to 1974 developed & o...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected frommilitary aircraft model oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: cia.gov
Title: DOC 0005517742
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0005517742.pdf
Source snippet
CLA's Role in the Study of UFOs, 1947-90CIA's U-2 and OXCART as UFOs In November 1954, CLA had entered into the world of high technolo...
Published: November 1954
2.
Source: aaro.mil
Title: AARO Historical Record Report Vol 1 2024
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Portals/136/PDFs/AARO_Historical_Record_Report_Vol_1_2024.pdf
Source snippet
AARO_Historical_Record_Repor...6 Mar 2024 — AARO assesses that some portion of sightings since the 1940s have represented misidentifi...
3.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF
Source snippet
Department of WarAARO Historical Record Report Volume 1March 9, 2024 — 8 Mar 2024 — CIA official was not involved in the movement of extr...
Published: March 9, 2024
4.
Source: war.gov
Title: dod report discounts sightings of extraterrestrial technology
Link:https://www.war.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3701297/dod-report-discounts-sightings-of-extraterrestrial-technology/
Source snippet
Department of WarDOD Report Discounts Sightings of Extraterrestrial...8 Mar 2024 — "AARO assesses that alleged, hidden UAP programs eith...
5.
Source: cia.gov
Title: area 51 and the accidental test flight
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/area-51-and-the-accidental-test-flight/
Source snippet
Area 51 and the Accidental Test Flight6 Aug 2015 — The first flight test of the CIA's A-12 OXCART took place at the Groom Lake facilit...
6.
Source: cia.gov
Title: Archangel CIAs Supersonic A 12 Reconnaissance Aircraft
Link:https://www.cia.gov/resources/csi/static/Archangel-CIAs-Supersonic-A-12-Reconnaissance-Aircraft.pdf
7.
Source: cia.gov
Title: ask molly what really went on at area 51
Link:https://www.cia.gov/stories/story/ask-molly-what-really-went-on-at-area-51/
8.
Source: osi.af.mil
Title: Nighthawk helps shape PJ legacy
Link:https://www.osi.af.mil/News/Features/Display/Article/2335334/nighthawk-helps-shape-pj-legacy/
9.
Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/The-Roswell-Report/
10.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science UAP FAQs
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
11.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/
12.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
13.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/
14.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/About/Mission-Vision/
15.
Source: archives.gov
Title: Project BLUE BOOK
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/military/air-force/ufos
16.
Source: archives.gov
Title: do records show proof of ufos
Link:https://www.archives.gov/news/articles/do-records-show-proof-of-ufos
17.
Source: archives.gov
Title: moving images and sound
Link:https://www.archives.gov/research/topics/uaps/moving-images-and-sound
18.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/espanol/ovnis
19.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/the-federal-register/1998-annual2.txt
20.
Source: georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov
Title: gov1. Instructions
Link:https://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/omb/procurement/fair/2004fair_spreadsheet.xls
21.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/federal-register/the-federal-register/2003-annual2.txt
22.
Source: archives.gov
Link:https://www.archives.gov/files/declassification/iscap/pdf/2014-004-doc01.pdf
23.
Source: war.gov
Link:https://www.war.gov/medialink/ufo/061226/release_03/documents/CIA-UAP-003-THE_CENTRAL_INTELLIGENCE_AGENCY_AND_OVERHEAD_RECONNAISSANCE-THE_U-2_AND_OXCART_PROGRAMS_1954-1974.pdf
24.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/DOC_0000838057.pdf
25.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/07083374
26.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/1992-04-01A.pdf
27.
Source: cia.gov
Title: ufos fact or fiction
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/collection/ufos-fact-or-fiction
28.
Source: cia.gov
Title: FOIA CASE LOG CALENDER YE[16111550]
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/FOIA%20CASE%20LOG%20CALENDER%20YE%5B16111550%5D.pdf
29.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CY%202007%20CASE%20LOG%5B15829352%5D.pdf
30.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/document/06935701
31.
Source: cia.gov
Link:https://www.cia.gov/readingroom/docs/CY%202008%20CASE%20LOG%5B15829355%5D.pdf
32.
Source: intelligence.gov
Link:https://www.intelligence.gov/publics-daily-brief/publics-daily-brief-articles/unidentified-aerial-phenomena-preliminary-intelligence-assessment
33.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
34.
Source: nro.gov
Title: NRO By the Numbers Dec 2021 2.1
Link:https://www.nro.gov/Portals/135/documents/history/csnr/NRO_By_the_Numbers_Dec_2021_2.1.pdf
35.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: constant peg secret migs in the desert
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/1682967/constant-peg-secret-migs-in-the-desert/
36.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195801/AFmuseum/avro-canada-vz-9av-avrocar/
37.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Press-Room/News/Article-Display/Article/110252/declassified-document-shows-real-flying-saucer/
38.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: AFD 101027 030
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2010/Oct/27/2001330219/-1/-1/0/AFD-101027-030.pdf
39.
Source: dafhistory.af.mil
Link:https://www.dafhistory.af.mil/Portals/16/documents/AFD-101201-038.pdf
40.
Source: cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk
Link:https://cdn.nationalarchives.gov.uk/documents/mar-2009-highlights-guide.pdf
41.
Source: darpa.mil
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/research/challenges/lift/faqs
42.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Press-Room/News/Article-Display/Article/198468/national-museum-of-the-us-air-force-to-include-xb-70-and-other-rd-aircraft-in-n/
43.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: mil Photos
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/igsearch/avrocar/
44.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: mil Photos
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/igcategory/Historic/igpage/7/igtag/CV-22/
45.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: mil Photos
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/igcategory/Historic/igpage/48/igtag/Cockpits/
46.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195801/USAFmuseum/avro-canada-vz-9av-avrocar/
47.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/igphoto/2001299081/
48.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: mil Photos
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/?igcategory=Historic&igpage=16&igsort=PhotoDate&igtag=Museum+Expansion
49.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: mil Photos
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/igcategory/Restoration/igpage/50/igsort/PhotoDate/igtag/Historic/
50.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Visit/Museum-Exhibits/Fact-Sheets/Display/Article/195671/museum-expansion-plans/
51.
Source: nationalmuseum.af.mil
Title: mil Photos
Link:https://www.nationalmuseum.af.mil/Upcoming/Photos/igcategory/Historic/igpage/16/igsort/PhotoDate/?igtag=Museum+Expansion
52.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Project Mogul
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Mogul
53.
Source: amac.us
Title: us air force reports on roswell
Link:https://amac.us/newsline/us-air-force-reports-on-roswell
Additional References
54.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZkNVSju99HY
Source snippet
This video provides direct context regarding how Pentagon officials evaluate unidentified anomalous phenomena and separate terrestrial cl...
55.
Source: space.com
Title: 28256 ufo sightings cia u2 aircraft
Link:https://www.space.com/28256-ufo-sightings-cia-u2-aircraft.html
Source snippet
CIA About UFOs of the 1950s and '60s: 'It Was Us'14 Jan 2015 — Several analysts dispute the CIA assertion that U-2 flights really ca...
56.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mvsU4p0Gsas
Source snippet
The Roswell UFO Crash (Overview) - Jimmy Akin's Mysterious World...
57.
Source: nro.gov
Link:https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/history/csnr/corona/StarCatchersWeb.pdf
58.
Source: nro.gov
Link:https://www.nro.gov/Portals/65/documents/foia/declass/mol/777.pdf
59.
Source: history.navy.mil
Title: CIA and the U-2
Link:https://www.history.navy.mil/browse-by-topic/disasters-and-phenomena/u2s-ufos-and-operation-blue-book.html
Source snippet
Naval History and Heritage CommandU-2s, UFOs, and Operation Blue Book24 Jan 2024 — U-2 and later OXCART flights accounted for more than o...
60.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/AskPhysics/comments/1dgc8od/are_there_good_scientific_explanations_for_ufo/
61.
Source: darpa.mil
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/research/programs/bridges
62.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/euronews/posts/for-years-the-new-york-times-has-tracked-the-release-of-us-ufo-files-which-cover/1425055729669753/
63.
Source: darpa.mil
Link:https://www.darpa.mil/news/2017/sharing-battlefield-information-mobile