Within UFO Hackers
Was the NASA Image Really a Spacecraft?
McKinnon recalled seeing part of a smooth object above Earth, but no saved image or screenshot exists for independent inspection.
On this page
- Mc Kinnon's description of the image
- Possible conventional explanations
- Why the missing file matters
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Gary McKinnon’s alleged sighting of a cigar-shaped object in a NASA image is the most visually striking part of his account, but also the hardest to test. He said that, while remotely browsing a computer associated with NASA’s Johnson Space Center, he briefly viewed a large image showing a smooth, silvery object above Earth, with rounded or geodesic structures on either side. The download was interrupted before he preserved the file, and no screenshot, filename, image metadata or independently authenticated copy has surfaced.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He Found21 Jun 2006 — The search for proof of the existence of UFOs landed Gary McKinnon in a world of troub…
The responsible conclusion is therefore limited: McKinnon may accurately remember seeing an unusual-looking image, but the surviving evidence cannot establish what the image depicted, whether it was an unrecognised spacecraft, or even whether his interpretation matched the original full-resolution file. The case is important less as proof of a hidden vehicle than as an example of how a vivid eyewitness description can become culturally powerful while remaining technically unverifiable.
McKinnon’s Description of the Image
McKinnon said his search was influenced by allegations that workers at Johnson Space Center maintained processed and unprocessed versions of space photographs, with anomalous objects supposedly removed from the processed copies. According to his 2006 account to Wired, he gained remote access to a NASA desktop and found folders containing very large, high-resolution images. His connection operated through a 56-kilobit-per-second dial-up service, making the transfer extremely slow.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
To obtain a usable view, he said he reduced the remote display to low resolution and four-bit colour. As part of an image appeared, he interpreted it as a silvery, cigar-shaped object with geodesic spheres on either side. He recalled no visible seams or rivets and believed that the picture had been taken from above, with Earth beneath the object. He could not estimate its size because the image contained no reliable scale reference.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
These details are often compressed in later retellings into the claim that McKinnon “downloaded a photograph of a giant spacecraft”. That wording overstates what he described. By his own account, he saw only a remotely rendered portion of a large image during an incomplete transfer. He did not obtain the original file, inspect its metadata or preserve the screen display before the remote session ended.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
McKinnon attributed the disconnection to somebody at NASA noticing his activity. That is possible, but the surviving account cannot distinguish deliberate intervention from a network interruption, a software failure or the instability of the remote session. His use of a Java-based remote-access application also meant, he said, that the image was not automatically written to his browser cache or temporary internet files.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
The central factual distinction is consequently straightforward:
- The unauthorised access is documented. US prosecutors and British courts recorded that McKinnon accessed NASA and other US government computers.[Department of Justice]justice.govOnce inside a network, McKinnon would then use the hacked computer to find additional military and NASA victims…
- The image’s contents are not documented. The official proceedings establish computer intrusion allegations, not the existence or identity of the object he later described.
- The surviving visual evidence is zero. Everything known about the supposed craft derives from McKinnon’s recollection and subsequent retellings.
Was the NASA Image Really a Spacecraft?
Nothing in the description alone permits a confident identification. “Cigar-shaped” is a broad visual category rather than a technical classification. Depending on viewing angle, cropping, resolution and contrast, ordinary objects such as spacecraft components, rocket stages, satellites, reflections or image artefacts can appear elongated and seamless.
The absence of scale is especially damaging. An object crossing a small part of a photograph might be a compact item near the camera, a conventional spacecraft at moderate distance or a much larger feature farther away. Without the image’s field of view, camera position, focal length, exposure, timestamp and target coordinates, apparent shape cannot establish physical dimensions. McKinnon himself acknowledged that there was no reference from which to estimate size.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
His viewing conditions also reduced the amount of recoverable information. Four-bit colour permits only 16 colours, while low screen resolution discards fine contours and surface detail. Those settings may have made a slow remote connection more usable, but they would also have amplified banding, simplified edges and concealed faint structures. A visually “smooth” surface under those conditions does not reliably show that the original object lacked joints, panels or other manufactured features.
Nor does the existence of processed and unprocessed image directories inherently indicate concealment. NASA formally distinguishes between raw instrument data and progressively processed products. Processing can include calibration, correction of sensor effects, geometric adjustment, contrast enhancement and conversion into scientifically interpretable imagery. The labels “raw”, “processed”, “filtered” or “unfiltered” therefore have routine technical meanings and do not by themselves demonstrate that objects were being erased.[nasa.gov]earthdata.nasa.govNASA EarthdataData Processing LevelsNASA data products are processed in levels ranging from Level 0 to Level 4. Level 0 products are raw…
This does not prove that McKinnon saw an ordinary object. It means that the observation lacks the information required to choose among ordinary, artificial, erroneous or genuinely anomalous explanations. Declaring the object an extraterrestrial spacecraft would require evidence that excluded those alternatives, and the surviving account cannot do that.
Possible Conventional Explanations
A conventional explanation cannot now be demonstrated, because the underlying image is unavailable. Several possibilities nevertheless fit the limited facts at least as well as the spacecraft interpretation.
A known vehicle seen from an unfamiliar angle. Spacecraft, payload adapters, upper rocket stages and cylindrical modules can appear cigar-shaped when their identifying features are obscured by distance or low resolution. Rounded tanks, antenna covers or attached components might resemble the “spheres” McKinnon remembered. Without a mission identifier or date, no comparison with a catalogue of known objects is possible.
A small object close to the camera. Space imagery can contain debris, ice particles, insulation or equipment near a crewed vehicle. With no depth cues, a nearby object can appear to float over Earth while seeming far larger than it really is. A single still frame cannot disclose its distance or motion.
A reflection or optical artefact. Glare, internal lens reflections and out-of-focus foreground objects may produce smooth, symmetrical forms. NASA’s own published image notes sometimes identify lens artefacts and describe their removal during preparation for public or scientific use. Such correction is ordinary photographic practice, not evidence that a physical craft has been concealed.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Great Balls of FireScience Great Balls of Fire
A compression or display artefact. Image compression can generate blocks, ringing, false boundaries and simplified shapes. NASA documentation explicitly notes that compressed spacecraft images may acquire a blocky or pixelated appearance, particularly after enhancement. Low-colour remote rendering would introduce a further layer of visual degradation.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Image CompressionScience Image Compression
A partially loaded or misrendered image. McKinnon was viewing the file through remote-control software while it was still transferring. If only part of the image had rendered, missing areas or progressive decoding could have altered the apparent outline. Without knowing the image format and software, it is impossible to reconstruct how the display behaved.
An ordinary image interpreted through prior expectations. McKinnon entered the system specifically looking for evidence of a UFO cover-up. That does not make his account dishonest, but prior expectations can shape how ambiguous visual material is classified. A person expecting to find a spacecraft is more likely to read an unfamiliar silhouette as one than someone approaching the same image without that expectation.
These explanations are possibilities, not solutions. Their importance is methodological: several ordinary mechanisms remain open, so an extraordinary identification cannot be reached from the description alone.
Why the Missing File Matters
A preserved copy would have transformed the case. Investigators could have examined the pixels at full resolution, searched for editing boundaries, identified compression signatures and extracted metadata recording the camera, acquisition time, processing history and file origin. Earth features might have helped reconstruct the viewing geometry, while mission records could have shown which spacecraft or instruments were operating nearby.
A screenshot would have been weaker than the original file but still valuable. It could have fixed the object’s outline, apparent position and relationship to the Earth background. Independent analysts could then have tested whether later verbal descriptions matched what was actually visible. Instead, even the most basic characteristics depend on memory: the number and location of the spherical structures, the object’s orientation, the amount of Earth visible and the quality of its edges.
The lack of a file also prevents provenance analysis. There is no filename, directory path, catalogue number or timestamp linking the claimed image to a particular NASA programme. It is therefore impossible to determine whether it originated with a satellite, an astronaut camera, a simulation, a presentation, an engineering archive or some unrelated material stored on the same machine.
Official records do corroborate the broader setting only in a limited sense. The US Department of Justice alleged that McKinnon accessed and damaged military and NASA computers, while the House of Lords later recorded that the case involved 16 NASA computers among 97 US government systems. Neither source authenticates the cigar-shaped image or records it as material recovered during the investigation.[Department of Justice]justice.govOnce inside a network, McKinnon would then use the hacked computer to find additional military and NASA victims…
McKinnon said that police seized his hard drive after his arrest, but no publicly available forensic finding has established that it contained the image. His explanation was that the Java remote-access arrangement had not cached the picture locally and that he had failed to take a screenshot before being disconnected.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
That evidential gap cannot be repaired by repeating the description. Later articles, podcasts and social-media posts generally trace back to McKinnon’s interviews rather than to an independent second witness or recovered NASA record. Repetition may make the story feel corroborated, but sources copying the same original claim do not create additional evidence.
A Careful Credibility Assessment
McKinnon’s account should not be dismissed merely because it concerns UFOs. It is possible for a witness to describe a real but unidentified image honestly and still be unable to prove what it showed. His description also contains cautionary details rather than complete certainty: he admitted that he had no scale and, when discussing related material, accepted that some of what he found might have an ordinary or hypothetical explanation.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
At the same time, sincerity is different from accuracy. The image was encountered during an unauthorised, technically constrained remote session by a viewer already convinced that NASA concealed UFO evidence. It was apparently seen briefly, at reduced colour depth and resolution, without contextual data. Those conditions create substantial risks of misperception and overinterpretation.
The most defensible classification is therefore an unverified recollection of an unidentified image. It is not proven false, because the missing file prevents a decisive conventional identification. It is not evidence of an extraterrestrial spacecraft, because the same absence prevents authentication, measurement and exclusion of ordinary alternatives.
Within the wider story of UFO-motivated hackers, the alleged NASA image illustrates the difference between gaining access to a sensitive network and obtaining reliable evidence from it. McKinnon’s access is documented; his interpretation of the image is not independently testable. The dramatic claim survives precisely where the usable data do not.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Was the NASA Image Really a Spacecraft?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
UFOs
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
Digital Image Processing
This is the eBook of the printed book and may not include any media, website access codes, or print supplements that may come packaged wi...
Spacecraft Systems Engineering
Following on from the hugely successful previous editions, the third edition of Spacecraft Systems Engineering incorporates the most rece...
Packing for Mars
Rating: 3.9/5 from 19 Google Books ratings
What happens to you when you can't walk for a year? When you can't have sex? Or smell flowers? What happens if you vomit in your helmet d...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromNASA UFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: wired.com
Title: ufo hacker tells what he found
Link:https://www.wired.com/2006/06/ufo-hacker-tells-what-he-found/
Source snippet
WIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He Found21 Jun 2006 — The search for proof of the existence of UFOs landed Gary McKinnon in a world of troub...
3.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict.htm
Source snippet
Once inside a network, McKinnon would then use the hacked computer to find additional military and NASA victims...
4.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/earth-observation-data-basics/data-processing-levels
Source snippet
NASA EarthdataData Processing LevelsNASA data products are processed in levels ranging from Level 0 to Level 4. Level 0 products are raw...
5.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/multimedia/raw-images-faq/
6.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/instruments/czcs/classic-scenes/radiation-scientific-imagery
7.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Great Balls of Fire
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/great-balls-of-fire/
8.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Image Compression
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/photojournal/image-compression/
9.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/romanian-national-who-operated-bulletproof-hosting-service-facilitated-distribution
10.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/romanian-national-known-virus-extradited-operating-bulletproof-hosting-service
11.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/pr/two-chinese-hackers-associated-ministry-state-security-charged-global-computer
12.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-cdca/pr/former-nasa-contractor-arrested-charges-alleging-hacking-and-online-threats-made-obtain
13.
Source: justice.gov
Title: united states v vladimir tsastsin et al 11 cr 878
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/programs/victim-witness-services/united-states-v-vladimir-tsastsin-et-al-11-cr-878
14.
Source: justice.gov
Title: USDO J: US Attorney’s Office
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nys/pressreleases/November11/tsastsinetalindictment.html
15.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archives/opa/pr/swedish-national-charged-hacking-and-theft-trade-secrets-related-alleged-computer-intrusions
16.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Antitrust Division | Indictment | United States Department of Justice
Link:https://www.justice.gov/atr/case-document/indictment-70
17.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2003/okeefeArrest.htm
18.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict2.htm
19.
Source: wired.com
Title: terrorist or ufo truth seeker
Link:https://www.wired.com/2006/04/terrorist-or-ufo-truth-seeker/
20.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/20100035204/downloads/20100035204.pdf
21.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Title: data latency
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/learn/earth-observation-data-basics/data-latency
22.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19730009710/downloads/19730009710.pdf?attachment=true
23.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Title: SARHB CH2 Content
Link:https://earthdata.nasa.gov/s3fs-public/2025-04/SARHB_CH2_Content.pdf
24.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Title: ASF SAR Seasat 204 Seasat History and Technical Challenges ASF
Link:https://earthdata.nasa.gov/s3fs-public/2024-09/ASF_SAR_Seasat_204_Seasat-History-and-Technical-Challenges-ASF.pdf?VersionId=XyhcIt7EwGXPcaKvIbQzsDX_iQO27jbX
25.
Source: www-pm.larc.nasa.gov
Link:https://www-pm.larc.nasa.gov/site/doc-library/references/DSCOVR/NAS.Triana.report.12.99.pdf
26.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/tools/firms/faq
27.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: earth observing 1
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/earth/earth-observatory/earth-observing-1/
28.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Title: asf mapready
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/tools/asf-mapready
29.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: how are webbs full color images made
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/mission/webb/science-overview/science-explainers/how-are-webbs-full-color-images-made/
30.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Title: new nasa digital elevation model
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/about/competitive-programs/measures/new-nasa-digital-elevation-model
31.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19940023749/downloads/19940023749.pdf
32.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/data/catalog
33.
Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/api/citations/19720019081/downloads/19720019081.pdf?attachment=true
34.
Source: earthdata.nasa.gov
Title: EOSDIS Handbook 1.5
Link:https://www.earthdata.nasa.gov/s3fs-public/imported/EOSDIS_Handbook_1.5.pdf
35.
Source: justice.gov
Title: 2011 press conferences
Link:https://www.justice.gov/usao-sdny/2011-press-conferences
36.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon
Additional References
37.
Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/16in31n/reminder_gary_mckinnon_caught_nasa_editing_uap/
Source snippet
Reminder: Gary McKinnon caught NASA editing UAP out of...It was a silvery, cigar-shaped object with geodesic spheres on either sid...
38.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080730/mckinn-1.htm
Source snippet
The 97 computers the appellant accessed were: 53 army computers, including computers based in Virginia and Washington that control the ar...
39.
Source: spectrum.ieee.org
Title: the autistic hacker
Link:https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-autistic-hacker
Source snippet
IEEE SpectrumGary McKinnon: The Autistic Hacker3 Jul 2024 —... UFOs. In fact, McKinnon claimed that UFOs were the reason for his hack. C...
40.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary Mc Kinnon? | Nord VPN
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImdnvQx7sQ
Source snippet
Ancient Aliens: Hacking NASA Secrets (Season 12, Episode 9) | History...
41.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ka4l7jdeQw
Source snippet
Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary McKinnon? | NordVPN...
42.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon wins extradition battle
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4lecD44F5E
Source snippet
The Most Dangerous File the Hacker Found on NASA Servers... (Aliens?!)...
43.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/OriginsExplained/videos/david-grusch-nasa-hacker-gary-mckinnon-the-alien-cover-up-is-real/1000575392635681/
44.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/UnexplainedMysteriousUniverse/posts/gary-mckinnon-said-he-didnt-break-into-nasa-for-money-or-espionage-he-was-search/1552576496873772/
45.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/BroBible/posts/gary-mckinnon-who-prosecutors-said-committed-the-biggest-military-computer-hack-/1390572326443225/
46.
Source: podmust.com
Link:https://podmust.com/ep/?epis=R2FyeSBNY0tpbm5vbjogVGhlIEhhY2tlciBXaG8gRm91bmQgTkFTQSdzIFVGTyAmIE5vbi1UZXJyZXN0cmlhbCBPZmZpY2Vycw%3D%3D&podcast=the-daily-conspiracy