Within UFO Hackers
What Did Gary Mc Kinnon Actually Find?
Gary McKinnon admitted entering US government systems, but his alleged UFO discoveries survive only through unverified recollections.
On this page
- The intrusions and official allegations
- The UFO claims in his own words
- What can and cannot be verified
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Gary McKinnon’s case began as a series of unauthorised intrusions into poorly protected United States military and NASA computers, carried out from London between 2001 and 2002. McKinnon acknowledged accessing the systems and said his purpose was to search for concealed evidence of UFOs, antigravity research and suppressed energy technology. US prosecutors, however, treated the activity as serious computer crime, alleging disruption, deleted files and losses approaching $900,000.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92…
The case is often remembered for McKinnon’s claims about “non-terrestrial officers” and an unexplained NASA image. Its greater documented significance lies elsewhere: in the scale of the security failure, the disputed extent of the damage, and the ten-year legal struggle over whether a vulnerable British defendant should be sent to the United States. No criminal trial ultimately tested the prosecution’s allegations or McKinnon’s explanations, and he released no original UFO files that could independently verify what he said he had seen.
What McKinnon actually did
Using the online name “Solo”, McKinnon searched US government networks for computers that could be accessed through weak security. He described scanning for Windows machines whose administrator accounts had blank or easily guessed passwords, then using remote-control software to browse their files and move between connected systems. His methods were not presented as the defeat of advanced encryption or a penetration of the most highly classified intelligence networks. The case instead exposed how elementary authentication failures could leave numerous government machines open to an outsider.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
The numerical descriptions of the intrusion vary because different legal documents counted different groups of machines. The 2002 Virginia indictment referred to 92 computers belonging to the Army, Navy, Air Force, Department of Defense and NASA, along with six computers operated by private businesses. Later British government and court summaries commonly described McKinnon as having gained unauthorised access to 97 US government computers. The figures therefore should not be casually combined into a single definitive total without noting that they came from different charges and summaries.[justice.gov]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92…
US prosecutors alleged that McKinnon copied account information and passwords, installed remote-access tools, deleted user accounts and removed files needed for normal computer operation. One charge concerned a computer used for national defence and security. The Virginia case also alleged that his actions caused the network serving the US Army’s Military District of Washington—comprising more than 2,000 computers—to become inoperable.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92…
A separate New Jersey case focused on systems at the Earle Naval Weapons Station. Prosecutors said the intrusion impaired a network involved in tracking naval munitions and disrupted hundreds of computers. The US authorities placed the combined cost of identifying, repairing and securing affected machines at roughly $700,000 to $900,000, depending on the indictment or public account being cited. These were prosecution allegations, not damages established by a verdict after contested evidence.[justice.gov]justice.govDepartment of Justice British National Charged with Hacking Into N.Jis charged in Virginia with causing approximately $900,000 in damages to computers located in 14 states. (News releases…
McKinnon admitted the unauthorised access but denied deliberately causing the extensive damage attributed to him. He maintained that he mainly browsed systems and that some disruption may have resulted from administrators responding to his presence. This difference—admitted intrusion versus disputed destruction—is central to understanding the case. Because extradition was eventually blocked and no British prosecution followed, a trial never resolved whose account of the technical consequences was more accurate.[WIRED]wired.comBritish UFO Hacker Gary Mc Kinnon Is Coming to AmericaBritish UFO Hacker Gary Mc Kinnon Is Coming to America
Why he was looking for UFO material
McKinnon said his hacking was driven by a belief that the US government possessed secret information about extraterrestrial craft, antigravity systems and sources of energy that could benefit the public. He identified testimony promoted by the Disclosure Project, whose participants alleged official concealment of UFO-related programmes, as an important influence on his search.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
His most widely repeated claim concerned NASA’s Johnson Space Center. McKinnon said he found directories containing high-resolution images in processed and unprocessed forms. Using a slow dial-up connection and remote desktop software, he claimed to have begun viewing an image of a smooth, silvery or cigar-shaped object above the Earth. He said the object appeared unlike a conventional aircraft, but that the connection was terminated before he could preserve the full image.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
McKinnon also described a spreadsheet headed “Non-Terrestrial Officers” and records referring to unfamiliar ship names and transfers between ships. He interpreted the material as potentially connected to military activity beyond Earth. Yet even in his own interview, he conceded that the documents might have related to a military exercise, a hypothetical scenario or some other terrestrial programme.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
That qualification is important. “Non-terrestrial” does not necessarily mean extraterrestrial; in administrative or military usage, it could describe personnel outside a particular territory, service structure or conventional posting category. Likewise, unfamiliar vessel names do not establish the existence of spacecraft. Without the files, surrounding records, metadata or testimony from their authors, the wording cannot be interpreted reliably.
McKinnon produced no saved image, spreadsheet, directory listing or contemporaneous note that could establish the contents or provenance of the material. His account survives principally through interviews given several years after the intrusion. It may accurately describe what he remembers seeing, but it does not provide independently testable evidence of a hidden space fleet or extraterrestrial technology.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…
From indictment to extradition battle
US investigators traced the activity to McKinnon in 2002, and federal grand juries brought computer-crime charges in Virginia and New Jersey. The Virginia indictment contained seven counts, each carrying a statutory maximum of ten years’ imprisonment and a substantial fine. Public discussion often multiplied those maximums to suggest a possible 70-year sentence, although an actual sentence after conviction would have depended on the charges proved, sentencing rules, judicial decisions and any guilty plea.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92…
The United States formally sought McKinnon’s extradition in 2004. He argued that the case should be handled in Britain because he had carried out the intrusions from his computer in London. US authorities maintained that the affected machines, institutions and damage were located in America, giving the United States a strong basis to prosecute. The resulting dispute became a prominent test of the UK–US extradition relationship.[UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsUK Parliament House of Lords
One of the most contentious issues was an offer discussed with US prosecutors. The House of Lords recorded that McKinnon had been told he could receive a considerably lower sentence, with the possibility of transfer to Britain, if he accepted responsibility and co-operated. If he contested extradition and later went to trial, prosecutors warned that he could face a much longer sentence and that they would not support repatriation.[UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsUK Parliament House of Lords
McKinnon argued that this pressure made the extradition process abusive and interfered with his rights. In July 2008, however, the House of Lords rejected his appeal. The judges regarded the proposal as a legitimate feature of the American plea-bargaining system rather than an unlawful threat sufficient to halt extradition.[UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsThe 97 computers the appellant accessed. It…
The ruling did not immediately end the case. McKinnon applied to the European Court of Human Rights, which briefly prevented his removal before declining to continue the bar. Further challenges in Britain concentrated increasingly on his health rather than on the original computer evidence.[GOV.UK]GOV.UKlatest on gary mckinnon case4 Nov 2010 — Mr McKinnon is accused by US authorities of the unauthorised access of 97 government computers concerned with national defen…
Asperger’s syndrome changed the legal question
During the proceedings, McKinnon was diagnosed with Asperger’s syndrome, then treated as a distinct diagnosis within the autism spectrum, and he experienced serious depression. Medical experts presented evidence that extradition, detention and prosecution in the United States would create an acute risk of suicide. His lawyers argued that sending him abroad in those circumstances would breach the European Convention on Human Rights.[The Guardian]theguardian.comThe Guardian Asperger's syndrome hacker 'should not be extraditedThe Guardian Asperger's syndrome hacker 'should not be extradited
The dispute was not simply over whether McKinnon was distressed or vulnerable. The legal question was whether the risk was so severe that extradition would violate the British government’s obligation to protect life and prevent inhuman treatment. Earlier courts had allowed the process to continue, but later psychiatric assessments strengthened the argument that his condition had deteriorated and that the danger could not be adequately managed after removal.[GOV.UK]GOV.UKlatest on gary mckinnon case4 Nov 2010 — Mr McKinnon is accused by US authorities of the unauthorised access of 97 government computers concerned with national defen…
On 16 October 2012, Home Secretary Theresa May stopped the extradition. She told Parliament that McKinnon was accused of serious crimes, but concluded that the risk of him ending his life was so high that extradition would be incompatible with his human rights. The decision was therefore not an acquittal, a finding that no hacking occurred or an endorsement of his UFO claims. It was an executive decision based on his health and the consequences of extradition.[GOV.UK]GOV.UKgary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statementgary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statement
May also announced wider changes intended to shift comparable decisions away from ministers. The government proposed a statutory “forum bar”, allowing courts to refuse extradition when a substantial part of the conduct occurred in Britain and it would be in the interests of justice to hold a domestic trial. That mechanism was later incorporated into the Extradition Act framework.[GOV.UK]GOV.UKgary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statementgary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statement
Why Britain did not prosecute him
Once extradition had been blocked, the Director of Public Prosecutions and the Metropolitan Police considered whether McKinnon should instead face charges in the United Kingdom. In December 2012, they announced that no British prosecution would take place.[The Guardian]theguardian.comgary mckinnon no uk chargesgary mckinnon no uk charges
The decision reflected practical evidential problems rather than a declaration of innocence. Most of the affected computers, administrators, forensic material and alleged harm were in the United States. Building a British case would have required transferring and presenting extensive American evidence under UK criminal procedure. Prosecutors concluded that the available material did not offer a realistic prospect of conviction in a domestic trial, particularly given the difficulty of proving the alleged damage and linking particular consequences to McKinnon’s conduct.[The Guardian]theguardian.comgary mckinnon no uk chargesgary mckinnon no uk charges
This left the case in an unusual position. McKinnon had publicly admitted obtaining unauthorised access, but he was neither tried nor convicted for the campaign. US indictments remained accusations, while the British decision not to charge meant the disputed technical details were never examined through cross-examination, expert evidence and judicial findings.
What the case proves—and what it does not
The strongest conclusions from the McKinnon case concern computer security and criminal jurisdiction. A person working from an ordinary home connection was apparently able to move through numerous unclassified military and government machines by exploiting weak passwords and inadequate administration. The episode demonstrated that the security of a large network could be undermined by routine failures at individual computers, even without highly sophisticated hacking techniques.[WIRED]wired.comfor hacking into military and NASA systems. Labeled as committing the "biggest military computer hack of all time" by U.S. officials, McK…
It also showed how internet crime complicates the question of where an offence should be tried. McKinnon was physically in Britain, the computers were principally in America, and the alleged operational consequences were felt by US institutions. The decade-long dispute helped turn “forum”—the most appropriate country for prosecution—into a central issue in later British extradition policy.[UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsUK Parliament House of Lords
The case does not prove that NASA concealed UFO photographs, that “non-terrestrial officers” served in space, or that a secret fleet existed. Those claims depend on McKinnon’s recollections and interpretations, unsupported by preserved source material. No court ruling, government statement or publicly available forensic record from the case substantiated them.
Nor does the absence of a trial prove that the US damage estimates were false. It means they were never established to the criminal standard of proof. The careful distinction is therefore between three levels of certainty:
- Established by McKinnon’s admissions: he repeatedly gained unauthorised access to US government computers while looking for UFO-related information.
- Alleged by US prosecutors but never tested at trial: that he intentionally deleted critical files, seriously disrupted military systems and caused losses of hundreds of thousands of dollars.
- Claimed by McKinnon without recoverable evidence: that he encountered imagery and records pointing towards concealed extraterrestrial or off-world activity.
Gary McKinnon’s hacking case remains closely associated with UFO culture because his unusual motive made the intrusion famous. Its enduring importance, however, comes from the contrast between a demonstrable security breach and an unverifiable discovery story, and from the legal consequences of trying to prosecute cross-border computer activity when health, human rights and competing national jurisdictions collide.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to What Did Gary Mc Kinnon Actually Find?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
Digital Image Processing
This is the eBook of the printed book and may not include any media, website access codes, or print supplements that may come packaged wi...
UFOs
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • Impeccably researched, this riveting journalistic investigation separates fact from fiction, and documents th...
The Cuckoo's Egg
This is the true story of how a systems manager at Lawrence Berkeley Lab singlehandedly tracked down and helped capture a computer hacker...
Rocket Propulsion Elements
Rating: 4.5/5 from 11 Google Books ratings
Aerospace Engineering/Mechanical Engineering The definitive text on rocket propulsion-now completely revised to reflect rapid advancement...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Endnotes
1.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict.htm
Source snippet
Department of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud...Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92...
2.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Department of Justice British National Charged with Hacking Into N.J
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict2.htm
Source snippet
is charged in Virginia with causing approximately $900,000 in damages to computers located in 14 states. (News releases...
3.
Source: wired.com
Title: ufo hacker tells what he found
Link:https://www.wired.com/2006/06/ufo-hacker-tells-what-he-found
Source snippet
He claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No...
4.
Source: wired.com
Link:https://www.wired.com/2006/04/terrorist-or-ufo-truth-seeker
Source snippet
for hacking into military and NASA systems. Labeled as committing the "biggest military computer hack of all time" by U.S. officials, McK...
5.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: Mc Kinnon comphacker
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2002/Nov/12/2001711901/-1/-1/1/McKinnon_comphacker.pdf
Source snippet
Department of WarU.S. Department of Justice United States Attorney Eastern...12 Nov 2002 — Gary McKinnon accessed without authorization...
6.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: latest on gary mckinnon case
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/latest-on-gary-mckinnon-case
Source snippet
4 Nov 2010 — Mr McKinnon is accused by US authorities of the unauthorised access of 97 government computers concerned with national defen...
7.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080730/mckinn-1.htm
Source snippet
The 97 computers the appellant accessed. It...
8.
Source: wired.com
Link:https://www.wired.com/2002/11/brit-accused-of-hacking-pentagon
9.
Source: wired.com
Title: British UFO Hacker Gary Mc Kinnon Is Coming to America
Link:https://www.wired.com/2008/07/british-ufo-hac
10.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldextradition/126/12620.htm
11.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080730/mckinn-2.htm
12.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: gary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statement
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/gary-mckinnon-extradition-case-home-secretarys-statement
13.
Source: homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk
Link:https://homeofficemedia.blog.gov.uk/2022/06/17/julian-assange-statement-and-extradition-factsheet/
14.
Source: wired.com
Link:https://www.wired.com/2002/11/brit-fights-hacking-extradition
15.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Victim Communication and Liaison (VCL) Scheme | The Crown Prosecution Service
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/victim-communication-and-liaison-vcl-scheme
16.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/no-way-out-new-prosecution-statement-confronts-silent-struggle-faced-male-victims-one
17.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Jurisdiction | The Crown Prosecution Service
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/jurisdiction
18.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/termination-proceedings-including-discontinuance
19.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/relations-other-prosecuting-agencies-and-prosecutors-convention
20.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Disclosure of Material to Third Parties | The Crown Prosecution Service
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/disclosure-material-third-parties
21.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Reconsidering a Prosecution Decision | The Crown Prosecution Service
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/reconsidering-prosecution-decision
22.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/extradition-uk
23.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/media-assessing-[public-interest
24.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Disclosure Manual: Chapter 18
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/disclosure-manual-chapter-18-revelation-and-disclosure-police-misconduct
25.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Instructions for Prosecuting Advocates | The Crown Prosecution Service
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/publication/instructions-prosecuting-advocates
26.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Appeal filter completes reform of extradition arrangements
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/appeal-filter-completes-reform-of-extradition-arrangements
27.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Public views
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/public-views
28.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Commons
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmhaff/644/120110.htm
29.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Number 10 Press Briefing
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/number-10-press-briefing-morning-from-5-december-2011
30.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Extradition review
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/extradition-review
31.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Independent review of the United Kingdom’s extradition arrangements
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/independent-review-of-the-united-kingdoms-extradition-arrangements
32.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Prime Minister and US President hold press conference on State Visit
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/prime-minister-and-us-president-hold-press-conference-on-state-visit
33.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: www.gov.uk Joint press conference with President Barack Obama
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/joint-press-conference-with-president-barack-obama
34.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200809/ldjudgmt/jd090304/rgrj-1.htm
35.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmjust/uc186-i/uc18602.htm
36.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Commons
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmselect/cmjust/186/9012002.htm
37.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080618/rvg-3.htm
38.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080618/rvg-1.htm
39.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080618/rvg-2.htm
40.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200506/ldjudgmt/jd060503/saik-4.htm
41.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk The US-UK Extradition Treaty
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm201012/cmselect/cmhaff/644/64403.htm
42.
Source: parliament.uk
Link:https://www.parliament.uk/business/news/news-by-year/2012/october/statement-on-gary-mckinnon/
43.
Source: hansard.parliament.uk
Title: uk Gary Mc Kinnon (Extradition)
Link:https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2009-12-01/debates/09120144000002/GaryMckinnon%28Extradition%29
44.
Source: committees.parliament.uk
Title: chair writes to home secretary regarding gary mckinnon and extradition
Link:https://committees.parliament.uk/committee/83/home-affairs-committee/news/179615/chair-writes-to-home-secretary-regarding-gary-mckinnon-and-extradition/
45.
Source: hansard.parliament.uk
Title: uk Extradition
Link:https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2012-10-16/debates/12101642000005/Extradition
46.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: uk House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld201415/ldselect/ldextradition/126/12614.htm
47.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Victims’ Guide
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/victims-guide/victims-guide-how-we-make-decision-what-do-your-case
48.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: reviewing finalised cases
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/reviewing-finalised-cases
49.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: How we make a decision on what to do in your case
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/rasso-guide/how-we-make-decision-what-do-your-case-0
51.
Source: wired.com
Title: mckinnon extradition win
Link:https://www.wired.com/2012/10/mckinnon-extradition-win/
52.
Source: abcnews.com
Link:https://abcnews.com/International/story?id=1945581&page=1
53.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon no uk charges
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/dec/14/gary-mckinnon-no-uk-charges
54.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: The Guardian Asperger’s syndrome hacker ‘should not be extradited’
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2009/jul/14/gary-mckinnon-aspergers-hacking
55.
Source: judiciary.uk
Link:https://www.judiciary.uk/guidance-and-resources/conclusions/
56.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2008/aug/28/hacking.security
57.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon not extradited may
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/16/gary-mckinnon-not-extradited-may
58.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon lodges challenge extradition
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/10/gary-mckinnon-lodges-challenge-extradition
59.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon feels set free
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/17/gary-mckinnon-feels-set-free
60.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon timeline extradition
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/16/gary-mckinnon-timeline-extradition
61.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/jul/09/weekend7.weekend2
62.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/video/2012/oct/16/gary-mckinnon-extradition-theresa-may-video
63.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon extradition timeline
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/26/gary-mckinnon-extradition-timeline
64.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2002/nov/13/hacking.internetcrime
65.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon
66.
Source: itv.com
Title: gary mckinnon
Link:https://www.itv.com/news/story/2012-12-14/gary-mckinnon
67.
Source: criminal.laws.com
Title: gary mckinnon
Link:https://criminal.laws.com/gary-mckinnon
Additional References
68.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Ancient Aliens: Hacking NASA Secrets (Season 12, Episode 9) | History
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=20rWFDfh68Y
Source snippet
This collection features reporting from major UK outlets like The Telegraph and Al Jazeera covering Home Secretary Theresa May's landmark...
69.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary Mc Kinnon?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImdnvQx7sQ
Source snippet
Ancient Aliens: Hacking NASA Secrets (Season 12, Episode 9) | History...
70.
Source: amuedge.com
Link:https://amuedge.com/extradition-of-super-hacker-mckinnon-denied-by-uk-government-cyber-security-experts-sound-off/
71.
Source: linuxsecurity.com
Link:https://linuxsecurity.com/news/hackscracks/dot-mil-hackers-download-mistake
72.
Source: podmust.com
Link:https://podmust.com/ep/?epis=R2FyeSBNY0tpbm5vbjogVGhlIEhhY2tlciBXaG8gRm91bmQgTkFTQSdzIFVGTyAmIE5vbi1UZXJyZXN0cmlhbCBPZmZpY2Vycw%3D%3D&podcast=the-daily-conspiracy
73.
Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/KendallsPlace/posts/he-hacked-nasa-looking-for-ufos-and-nearly-got-life-in-prison/1598324498636439/
74.
Source: medium.com
Link:https://medium.com/the-lindberg-interviews/interview-with-ufo-hacker-gary-mckinnon-5aa5d366828b
75.
Source: cybereason.com
Link:https://www.cybereason.com/blog/malicious-life-podcast-the-u.s-vs.-gary-mckinnon
76.
Source: vlex.co.uk
Link:https://vlex.co.uk/vid/mckinnon-v-united-states-793612009
77.
Source: spectrum.ieee.org
Link:https://spectrum.ieee.org/the-autistic-hacker