Within UFO Hackers
Does Prosecution Prove a UFO Cover Up?
Government prosecution can establish concern about intrusion without showing that officials were suppressing the specific material sought.
On this page
- Why intrusions trigger prosecution
- What concealment evidence would require
- Common errors in cover up reasoning
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
The prosecution of a UFO-motivated hacker can establish that government computers were entered without permission, disrupted or exposed to security risks. It does not, by itself, establish that the intruder found concealed evidence of extraterrestrial technology. These are separate propositions requiring different evidence.
Gary McKinnon’s case illustrates the distinction. US authorities accused him of accessing 97 military and NASA computers, copying information and causing damage. McKinnon acknowledged unauthorised access but said he was searching for evidence of suppressed UFO knowledge and advanced technology. The legal response was directed at the alleged intrusion and its consequences, not at proving or disproving his interpretation of material he claimed to have seen.[parliament.uk]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsUK ParliamentHouse of Lords - Mckinnon V Government of The United…30 Jul 2008 — The appellant appealed against the decisions both of t…
A severe prosecution may therefore show that officials considered the access serious. It cannot reliably be treated as indirect confirmation that the target systems contained extraordinary secrets. To support a UFO cover-up claim, evidence would need to connect identifiable material, responsible officials and deliberate concealment in a form that can be independently checked.
Why intrusions trigger prosecution
Computer-crime law protects access controls, system integrity and operational security. Under the UK Computer Misuse Act 1990, unauthorised access is itself an offence when someone knowingly causes a computer to perform a function in order to secure access they are not entitled to obtain. More serious provisions cover unauthorised acts intended to impair systems or carried out recklessly as to whether impairment will result. The prosecution does not need to establish that the material being sought was genuine, extraordinary or politically embarrassing.[Legislation.gov.uk]legislation.gov.ukComputer Misuse Act 1990Unauthorised access to computer material. 2.Unauthorised access with intent to commit or facilitate commission of…
The same basic separation appears in US law. The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act addresses conduct such as knowingly accessing protected computers without authorisation, obtaining information, causing damage or furthering fraud. Federal prosecution policy describes the legislation as a means of addressing computer-based crime; its subject is the manner and consequences of access, not the truth of a hacker’s beliefs about what might be stored on the system.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of Justice9-48.000Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFebruary 20, 2015 — The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), codified at Title 18, United States Code, Sectio…
This matters particularly when military networks are involved. Even apparently unsophisticated entry can expose passwords, configurations, personnel information and operational weaknesses. It can require forensic investigation, password resets, system restoration and an assessment of whether information was altered or passed to others. Authorities also have no reliable way, at the outset, to assume that an intruder motivated by UFO curiosity is harmless. The same access route could be used by a foreign intelligence service, a saboteur or someone seeking sensitive defence information.
McKinnon’s alleged targets included computers associated with national defence, military districts and naval munitions support. The US indictment alleged that he obtained unauthorised access, installed remote-access software, copied account information and passwords, deleted files and contributed to network disruption. Those were allegations rather than findings reached after a completed criminal trial, but they explain why prosecutors could regard the case as a major security matter without adopting any view about UFOs.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon, of London, England, was indicted in Alexandri…
The political intensity surrounding the case also needs careful interpretation. Much of the later dispute concerned extradition, possible punishment and McKinnon’s health. In 2012, the Home Secretary blocked extradition because medical evidence indicated that sending him to the United States would create an unacceptably high risk that he would end his life. That decision was explicitly a human-rights judgement, not a ruling that his UFO claims were true or that the alleged intrusion had never occurred.[GOV.UK]GOV.UKgary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statementgary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statement
British prosecutors subsequently decided not to bring a domestic case. Reporting at the time said police and the Crown Prosecution Service judged the prospects of conviction to be poor, partly because evidence and witnesses were located in the United States. Again, that outcome did not authenticate the material McKinnon claimed to have viewed. It reflected the practical and evidential requirements of a criminal prosecution years after the events.[The Guardian]theguardian.comgary mckinnon no uk chargesgary mckinnon no uk charges
What concealment evidence would require
Evidence of unauthorised access answers a relatively narrow question: did someone knowingly enter or interfere with a computer system without permission? Evidence of a UFO cover-up must answer a more demanding chain of questions.
First, the disputed material must be preserved or otherwise recoverable. McKinnon said he briefly viewed an unusual image and encountered terms such as “Non-Terrestrial Officers”, but he did not produce the image, the alleged list or a verifiable copy of the relevant files. In his account, the slow connection was interrupted before he could save the large image or capture the screen. His testimony is evidence that he reported such an experience; it is not independently testable evidence of what the underlying file depicted.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundufo hacker tells what he found
Second, the material requires authentication. A credible assessment would need details such as:
- the originating system and directory;
- file names, dates, metadata and access logs;
- the identity and authority of the document’s author;
- a reliable chain of custody;
- confirmation that the material was not a draft, joke, exercise, ordinary operational record or misread terminology;
- comparison with other records or testimony.
Without those controls, even an accurately remembered phrase may be ambiguous. “Non-terrestrial”, for example, could describe an assignment outside the Earth’s atmosphere, a category in a fictional or speculative document, an internal shorthand, or something else entirely. The phrase cannot acquire an extraterrestrial meaning merely because that was what the searcher hoped to find.
Third, proof of concealment requires evidence of intention. A classified file is not automatically evidence of a cover-up. Governments lawfully restrict information concerning weapons, intelligence methods, surveillance capabilities, personnel and experimental aircraft. Concealment of extraterrestrial evidence would require something more specific: records showing that responsible officials possessed relevant material, understood its significance and deliberately withheld or misrepresented it.
Fourth, the evidence should survive independent examination. That might involve multiple authenticated documents, corroborating witnesses with direct access, physical material available for testing, or sensor records collected with known instruments and sufficient metadata. NASA’s independent UAP study stressed that firm conclusions depend on high-quality, calibrated and reproducible data. It found no conclusive evidence in peer-reviewed literature that UAP had an extraterrestrial origin and identified poor or incomplete data as a central obstacle to interpretation.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience Independent Study Team ReportScience Independent Study Team Report
This standard is not designed to rule extraordinary explanations out in advance. It is designed to separate a conclusion from the circumstances in which someone first formed it. A hacker may genuinely believe that a file proves something remarkable while still misunderstanding its language, provenance or technical setting.
Why a strong response is not an admission
A common cover-up argument runs as follows: officials would not have pursued the hacker so aggressively unless he had discovered something highly sensitive; therefore, the prosecution confirms the discovery. The reasoning is tempting because punishment can appear proportionate to the value of the secret. In computer-security cases, however, the premise does not hold.
The severity of a response may be explained by the systems entered rather than the specific content seen. Military and government networks receive heightened protection because unauthorised access can expose vulnerabilities, disrupt operations and demonstrate that defences have failed. Authorities may also seek deterrence: leaving a prominent intrusion unanswered could encourage others to repeat it, regardless of whether the first intruder found anything important.
The timing of McKinnon’s activity added to the sensitivity. His alleged access extended across 2001 and early 2002, including the period after the attacks of 11 September 2001, when interference with US military systems was likely to be interpreted through an especially acute national-security lens. The House of Lords judgement records allegations involving interference with defence computers and describes the extradition proceedings that followed. None of that legal analysis depended on accepting his claims about alien spacecraft.[UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsUK ParliamentHouse of Lords - Mckinnon V Government of The United…30 Jul 2008 — The appellant appealed against the decisions both of t…
It is also misleading to treat the resources devoted to an investigation as a measurement of what was discovered. Investigators must determine the scope of access before they can know what an intruder saw, copied or changed. A large response may reflect uncertainty: officials investigate precisely because they do not initially know whether the breach was trivial, destructive or connected to a wider operation.
Nor does classification settle the matter. Some UFO reports have intersected with classified aerospace and intelligence programmes because observers unknowingly saw secret aircraft, surveillance balloons or other restricted technology. The presence of secrecy can explain both unidentified observations and official reluctance to disclose details without implying the existence of extraterrestrial craft. The US All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office’s historical review concluded that it had found no empirical evidence of a government programme concealing extraterrestrial beings or technology, while recognising that secrecy surrounding genuine national-security programmes helped generate or sustain some suspicions.[U.S. Department of War]media.defense.govDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUMEDOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME
That official conclusion is not beyond criticism merely because it is official. A cover-up allegation cannot be disproved solely by asking the institution accused of concealment. But the reverse is equally important: distrust of the institution cannot substitute for affirmative evidence that concealment occurred.
Common errors in cover-up reasoning
The gap between intrusion and proof is often obscured by several recurring mistakes.
Treating motive as corroboration. McKinnon searched government systems because he already believed that authorities were hiding UFO and “free energy” information. Finding unfamiliar words or imagery within that search can feel confirmatory, but the prior belief increases the risk of interpreting ambiguous material in the expected direction. His sincerity is relevant to understanding his actions, not to establishing the accuracy of his conclusions.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundufo hacker tells what he found
Equating access with expertise. Entering a specialist system does not make the intruder qualified to interpret every file within it. Photographic processing, military personnel terminology, spacecraft operations and classified programme administration each have specialised conventions. Without contextual documents or informed witnesses, an unusual label may be impossible to interpret reliably.
Converting an allegation into an adjudicated fact. The US indictment set out the prosecution’s case, including damage and disruption allegations. An indictment establishes that charges have been authorised; it is not a verdict. McKinnon was not extradited, and the allegations were never tested in a completed US trial. The distinction matters both ways: the lack of a trial does not prove that the allegations were false, while the existence of charges does not prove every allegation was correct.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon, of London, England, was indicted in Alexandri…
Using missing evidence as evidence of removal. When no copy of a claimed file survives, supporters may suggest that officials erased it. That is possible in the abstract, but it cannot be assumed from the absence itself. The same absence is also consistent with failure to save the material, mistaken recollection, misunderstanding or a file that was never what the observer believed it to be.
Assuming every unresolved detail favours the extraordinary explanation. An image that cannot be identified is not automatically an extraterrestrial spacecraft. “Unidentified” describes the current state of knowledge, not the object’s origin. NASA and other UAP investigators repeatedly distinguish unexplained cases from evidence of extraterrestrial activity, noting that many cases remain unresolved because the available observations are too limited for confident identification.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govOpen source on nasa.gov.
Making the claim immune to contrary evidence. A theory becomes impossible to evaluate when prosecution is treated as proof of concealment, non-prosecution as proof that authorities fear disclosure, missing files as proof of destruction and official denials as further proof of conspiracy. When every possible outcome confirms the same conclusion, the argument no longer identifies what evidence could show it to be mistaken.
A better test of the claim
The fairest assessment separates three questions that are frequently collapsed into one.
- Was there unauthorised access?
McKinnon admitted entering US government systems without permission, although the precise scope, damage and legal characterisation remained contested. This is the strongest and least speculative part of the account.[UK Parliament]publications.parliament.ukUK Parliament House of LordsUK ParliamentHouse of Lords - Mckinnon V Government of The United…30 Jul 2008 — The appellant appealed against the decisions both of t…
- Did he encounter material he found unusual?
His interviews provide first-person testimony that he did. Because the material was not preserved for public examination, the claim cannot now be independently authenticated or interpreted with confidence.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundufo hacker tells what he found
- Did that material prove deliberate concealment of extraterrestrial technology?
The available public evidence does not establish this. There is no authenticated file, image, metadata trail or independent witness evidence tying his reported observations to an extraterrestrial programme and a deliberate policy of concealment.
This conclusion does not require assuming that governments disclose everything, that all UAP reports have been explained or that McKinnon fabricated his account. It rests on a narrower point: evidence sufficient to justify a prosecution for computer intrusion is not evidence sufficient to prove what was stored on the penetrated systems.
The central distinction
The McKinnon case demonstrates a real government concern: an outsider could gain unauthorised entry to sensitive networks and allegedly interfere with them. It also demonstrates the evidential limits of an extraordinary discovery claim that was not preserved.
A prosecution can support the proposition that an intrusion mattered. It may show that the systems were sensitive, that access controls were breached or that authorities feared operational harm. It does not reveal why every file was restricted, authenticate a hacker’s interpretation or prove that officials were suppressing the particular information he hoped to find.
The appropriate question is therefore not, “Why prosecute him so strongly if there was nothing to hide?” Governments have many ordinary and compelling reasons to defend military networks. The useful question is, “What evidence independently connects the prosecution to deliberate concealment of the claimed UFO material?” In McKinnon’s case, that connecting evidence has not emerged.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Does Prosecution Prove a UFO Cover Up?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Cuckoo's Egg
This is the true story of how a systems manager at Lawrence Berkeley Lab singlehandedly tracked down and helped capture a computer hacker...
Ghost in the Wires: My Adventures as the World's Most Wanted...
In this "intriguing, insightful and extremely educational" novel, the world's most famous hacker teaches you easy cloaking and counter-me...
The Demon-Haunted World: Science as a Candle in the Dark
NEW YORK TIMES BESTSELLER • From the renowned astronomer and author of Cosmos comes a “powerful [and] stirring defense of informed ration...
Calling Bullshit: The Art of Skepticism in a Data-Driven World
Bullshit isn’t what it used to be. Now, two science professors give us the tools to dismantle misinformation and think clearly in a world...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromalien conspiracy poster oneBay.co.uk.
Endnotes
1.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080730/mckinn-1.htm
Source snippet
UK ParliamentHouse of Lords - Mckinnon V Government of The United...30 Jul 2008 — The appellant appealed against the decisions both of t...
2.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict.htm
Source snippet
Department of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud...Gary McKinnon, of London, England, was indicted in Alexandri...
3.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: latest on [gary mckinnon case]({{ ‘mc-kinnon-case/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/latest-on-gary-mckinnon-case
Source snippet
4 Nov 2010 — Mr McKinnon is accused by US authorities of the unauthorised access of 97 government computers concerned with national defen...
4.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/contents
Source snippet
Computer Misuse Act 1990Unauthorised access to computer material. 2.Unauthorised access with intent to commit or facilitate commission of...
5.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/section/3
Source snippet
Computer Misuse Act 1990, Section 3A person is guilty of an offence if— · he does any unauthorised act in relation to a computer; · at th...
6.
Source: justice.gov
Title: Department of Justice9-48.000
Link:https://www.justice.gov/jm/jm-9-48000-computer-fraud
Source snippet
Computer Fraud and Abuse ActFebruary 20, 2015 — The Computer Fraud and Abuse Act (CFAA), codified at Title 18, United States Code, Sectio...
Published: February 20, 2015
7.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nj/Press/files/pdffiles/Older/edva_mckinnon_indictment.pdf
8.
Source: GOV.UK
Title: gary mckinnon extradition case home secretarys statement
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/speeches/gary-mckinnon-extradition-case-home-secretarys-statement
9.
Source: wired.com
Title: ufo hacker tells what he found
Link:https://www.wired.com/2006/06/ufo-hacker-tells-what-he-found/
11.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science Independent Study Team Report
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/uap-independent-study-team-final-report.pdf
12.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/
13.
Source: justice.gov
Title: 06.30.23. – Mar-a-Lago Search Warrant
Link:https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-07/06.30.23.%20–%20Mar-a-Lago%20Search%20Warrant%20-%20Interim.pdf
14.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-05/03.10.23.%20–%20Incidents%20With%20Migrants%20and%20USCBP%20-%20Part%201.pdf
15.
Source: justice.gov
Title: 02.14.23. Protests Supreme Court Residences Part 1
Link:https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-02/02.14.23.%20–%20Protests%20Supreme%20Court%20Residences%20–%20Part%201.pdf
16.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy/2007/01/11/usab4502.pdf
17.
Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/sites/default/files/usao/legacy/2010/10/12/usab4309.pdf
18.
Source: justice.gov
Title: 04.11.23. Incidents With Migrants and USCBP Interim
Link:https://www.justice.gov/d9/2023-05/04.11.23.%20–%20Incidents%20With%20Migrants%20and%20USCBP%20–%20Interim.pdf
19.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2015/9/notes/division/3/2
20.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/section/3ZA
21.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18/body/enacted/data.xht?view=snippet&wrap=true
22.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/1990/18
23.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Title: Computer misuse
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2020/13/schedule/2/part/2/crossheading/computer-misuse
24.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2006/48/notes/division/5/1/5
25.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/ukpga/2007/27/schedules/2020-12-31/data.html
26.
Source: legislation.gov.uk
Title: SCHEDUL E 1
Link:https://www.legislation.gov.uk/asp/2020/13/schedules/2021-12-10/data.xht
27.
Source: time.com
Title: hack attack 2
Link:https://time.com/archive/6943962/hack-attack-2/
28.
Source: hansard.parliament.uk
Title: uk Gary Mc Kinnon (Extradition)
Link:https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2009-12-01/debates/09120144000002/GaryMckinnon%28Extradition%29
29.
Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/
30.
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: public views 4
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7aaeb5e5274a34770e661b/public-views-4.pdf
31.
Source: assets.publishing.service.gov.uk
Title: public views 3
Link:https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7af96ae5274a319e77c120/public-views-3.pdf
32.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: computer misuse act
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/computer-misuse-act
33.
Source: youtube.com
Title: The Interview They Tried to Erase From the Internet
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WvILY-h-6_Y
Source snippet
Gary McKinnon | UK Computer Hacker Who Was Accused Of The Biggest US Military Hack Of All Time...
34.
Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FIlHu3YUBN4
35.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon no uk charges
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/dec/14/gary-mckinnon-no-uk-charges
36.
Source: media.defense.gov
Title: DOPSR 2024 0263 AARO HISTORICAL RECORD REPORT VOLUME 1 2024
Link:https://media.defense.gov/2024/Mar/08/2003409233/-1/-1/0/DOPSR-2024-0263-AARO-HISTORICAL-RECORD-REPORT-VOLUME-1-2024.PDF
37.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2024/mar/08/pentagon-ufo-report-hiding-aliens
38.
Source: Wikipedia
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon
39.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/
40.
Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/
41.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon hacker sparked storm
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/16/gary-mckinnon-hacker-sparked-storm
42.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon feels set free
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2012/oct/17/gary-mckinnon-feels-set-free
43.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon lodges challenge extradition
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/dec/10/gary-mckinnon-lodges-challenge-extradition
44.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2008/aug/28/hacking.security
45.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: film scottish hacker gary mckinnon fight against us extradition
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/29/film-scottish-hacker-gary-mckinnon-fight-against-us-extradition
46.
Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/jul/09/weekend7.weekend2
47.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: gary mckinnon extradition timeline
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/nov/26/gary-mckinnon-extradition-timeline
48.
Source: theguardian.com
Title: mckinnon extradition hacker
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/technology/2008/dec/02/mckinnon-extradition-hacker
49.
Source: itv.com
Title: gary mckinnon
Link:https://www.itv.com/news/story/2012-12-14/gary-mckinnon
50.
Source: media.techtarget.com
Link:https://media.techtarget.com/rms/computerweekly/DowntimePDF/pdf/mckinnon.pdf
Additional References
51.
Source: law.cornell.edu
Title: Legal Information Institute18 U.S
Link:https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/1030
Source snippet
Code § 1030 - Fraud and related activity in connection...Knowingly and with intent to defraud, accesses a protected computer without aut...
52.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary Mc Kinnon? | Nord VPN
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImdnvQx7sQ
Source snippet
The Interview They Tried to Erase From the Internet...
53.
Source: fbi.gov
Link:https://www.fbi.gov/news/testimony/issue-of-intrusions-into-government-computer-networks
54.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon wins extradition battle
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4lecD44F5E
Source snippet
Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary McKinnon? | NordVPN...
55.
Source: researchgate.net
Link:https://www.researchgate.net/publication/374373111_UFOs_and_Unidentified_Anomalous_Phenomena_The_NASA_report_1492023_has_found_no_evidence_to_suggest_that_UAPs_are_extraterrestrial_in_origin
56.
Source: apnews.com
Link:https://apnews.com/article/8b477a5ed6a42f99bb13a4518368ce9a
57.
Source: apnews.com
Link:https://apnews.com/article/5638be273b753253713a478546849e46
58.
Source: nacdl.org
Link:https://www.nacdl.org/Content/CFAABackground
59.
Source: libertyhumanrights.org.uk
Link:https://www.libertyhumanrights.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/Libertys-submission-to-the-JCHR-extradition-inquiry-Jan-2011.pdf
60.
Source: cybereason.com
Link:https://www.cybereason.com/blog/malicious-life-podcast-the-u.s-vs.-gary-mckinnon