Within Mathew Bevan
Why Bevan's Case Ended Without a Trial
The British case ended without a trial because of evidential, jurisdictional and cost problems, not because Roswell claims were validated.
On this page
- The charges brought after his arrest
- Why US evidence complicated prosecution
- How UFO retellings misread the acquittal
Page outline Jump by section
Introduction
Mathew Bevan’s prosecution did not collapse because investigators concluded that his claims about Roswell or alleged hidden UFO technology were true. Instead, the case ended for practical legal reasons that reflected the difficulty of prosecuting an early cross-border computer crime in the 1990s. After Bevan was arrested in Britain in 1996 on charges relating to unauthorised access to United States military and defence-contractor computer systems, prosecutors ultimately decided not to proceed. In November 1997, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) offered no evidence, and the court formally recorded not guilty verdicts.[The Washington Post]washingtonpost.comThe Washington Post BRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKERThe Washington PostBRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKER - The Washington PostJune 24, 1996…
The collapse of the prosecution has since been misrepresented in some UFO retellings as an implicit acknowledgement that Bevan had found extraordinary information. The historical record points in the opposite direction. Contemporary reporting and statements made in court indicate that the prosecution failed because of evidential, jurisdictional and cost considerations in an unusually complex international hacking case, not because Bevan’s Roswell-related beliefs had been validated.[The Independent]independent.co.ukOpen source on independent.co.uk.
The charges brought after his arrest
Bevan was arrested in June 1996 following a lengthy investigation by Scotland Yard and United States authorities into intrusions into networks operated by the US Air Force and Lockheed Martin. Prosecutors alleged that he had conspired to gain unauthorised access to computer systems and to make unauthorised modifications to them, offences prosecuted under the United Kingdom’s Computer Misuse Act framework.[The Washington Post]washingtonpost.comThe Washington Post BRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKERThe Washington PostBRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKER - The Washington PostJune 24, 1996…
The allegations arose from the same broader investigation that had identified Richard Pryce (“Datastream Cowboy”), although the two defendants occupied different positions in the investigation and their cases were ultimately resolved differently. Pryce pleaded guilty and received a financial penalty before Bevan’s case reached trial.[The Washington Post]washingtonpost.comThe Washington Post BRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKERThe Washington PostBRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKER - The Washington PostJune 24, 1996…
Importantly, the prosecution concerned unauthorised computer access and related offences. It was never a legal examination of Roswell, UFO evidence or claims about recovered extraterrestrial technology.
Why US evidence complicated prosecution
The principal obstacle was not proving that computer intrusions had occurred; those intrusions were well documented. The difficulty lay in presenting a criminal case in a British court based heavily on evidence, witnesses and computer records located in another country.
By modern standards, international digital investigations were still relatively immature. Prosecutors faced several practical problems:
- Much of the relevant technical evidence originated from US military systems.
- Witnesses capable of explaining network logs and computer damage were largely based in the United States.
- The investigation involved multiple organisations, including military facilities and defence contractors.
- Digital forensic procedures and international evidence-sharing arrangements were less developed than they are today.
These factors increased both the complexity and the anticipated cost of presenting a successful prosecution in Britain. Modern legal scholarship on cross-border digital investigations identifies many of the same challenges—jurisdictional differences, evidence transfer, witness coordination and differing legal standards—that were especially acute during the early internet era.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv So K: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital EvidenceSoK: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital EvidenceMay 25, 2022…
Why prosecutors decided not to continue
When the case reached Woolwich Crown Court in November 1997, the CPS chose to offer no evidence rather than proceed with a lengthy trial.
According to contemporary reporting from the hearing, prosecution counsel stated that continuing with an expensive and prolonged trial was no longer in the public interest. He also noted that the court’s sentencing powers were limited and described Bevan’s role as secondary to that of Richard Pryce, whose case had already concluded. The judge therefore entered formal not guilty verdicts.[The Independent]independent.co.ukOpen source on independent.co.uk.
This outcome is consistent with normal Crown Prosecution Service practice. Under UK criminal procedure, prosecutors may terminate proceedings by offering no evidence when, after review, they conclude that a prosecution should not continue. Once that occurs in the Crown Court and a not guilty verdict is entered, the proceedings are generally final.[Crown Prosecution Service]cps.gov.ukOpen source on cps.gov.uk.
How UFO retellings misread the acquittal
Later accounts within UFO literature and online discussions sometimes imply that Bevan escaped prosecution because authorities wished to avoid public discussion of files connected with Roswell or advanced propulsion research.
The available evidence does not support that interpretation.
The court proceedings did not revolve around evaluating the truth of Bevan’s UFO claims. There is no indication in contemporary reporting that prosecutors abandoned the case because of classified revelations, disputed Roswell documents or any acknowledgement that Bevan had uncovered evidence of extraterrestrial technology. Instead, the reasons placed before the court centred on prosecution practicality, proportionality and public interest.[The Independent]independent.co.ukOpen source on independent.co.uk.
This distinction matters because an acquittal following the prosecution’s decision to offer no evidence is not a judicial finding that a defendant’s wider beliefs or explanations are correct. It simply means the prosecution did not proceed with proving the criminal charges before the court.
What the collapsed case means in the history of UFO-motivated hacking
Within the broader history of UFO-motivated hackers such as Gary McKinnon, Bevan’s prosecution illustrates an important legal rather than paranormal lesson.
His case demonstrates how difficult early international computer-crime prosecutions could be when evidence, witnesses and affected computer systems were spread across national borders. The collapse of the prosecution reflected those procedural realities and the CPS’s assessment of whether continuing was justified.
At the same time, the case has acquired a mythology that often separates it from the legal record. Bevan’s Roswell motivation helps explain why he reportedly targeted systems associated with Wright-Patterson Air Force Base, but the end of the prosecution provides no independent support for his belief that he had discovered evidence of recovered alien technology. The legal outcome and the UFO narrative are separate issues, and the historical evidence supports keeping them distinct.[independent.co.uk]independent.co.ukOpen source on independent.co.uk.
Amazon book picks
Further Reading
Books and field guides related to Why Bevan's Case Ended Without a Trial. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.
The Hacker Crackdown
The bestselling cyberpunk author "has produced by far the most stylish report from the computer outlaw culture since Steven Levy's Hacker...
The Cuckoo's Egg
This is the true story of how a systems manager at Lawrence Berkeley Lab singlehandedly tracked down and helped capture a computer hacker...
Ghost in the Wires
In this "intriguing, insightful and extremely educational" novel, the world's most famous hacker teaches you easy cloaking and counter-me...
eBay marketplace picks
Marketplace Samples
Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.
Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.
Current eBay listing
VINTAGE UFO FLYING SAUCERS COMIC ADVERTISING A2 POSTER PRINT
Current eBay listing
I Want To Believe UFO Poster Giclée Fine Art Heavyweight Print
Endnotes
1.
Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv So K: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital Evidence
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2205.12911
Source snippet
SoK: Cross-border Criminal Investigations and Digital EvidenceMay 25, 2022...
Published: May 25, 2022
2.
Source: swarb.co.uk
Title: director of public prosecutions v bignell and another qbd 6 jun 1997
Link:https://swarb.co.uk/director-of-public-prosecutions-v-bignell-and-another-qbd-6-jun-1997/
Source snippet
Director of Public Prosecutions v Bignell and Another: QBD 6 Jun 1997 - swarb.co.ukMay 15, 2022 — May the law be with you – lex vobiscum...
Published: May 15, 2022
3.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Title: The Washington Post BRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKER
Link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/national/1996/06/24/britain-charges-computer-hacker/8902947e-298d-46c8-b0b1-fb9a23c625b6/
Source snippet
The Washington PostBRITAIN CHARGES COMPUTER HACKER - The Washington PostJune 24, 1996...
Published: June 24, 1996
4.
Source: independent.co.uk
Link:https://www.independent.co.uk/news/court-frees-man-in-military-hacking-case-1295386.html
5.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/termination-proceedings-including-discontinuance
6.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Title: Crown Prosecution Service Computer Misuse Act | The Crown Prosecution Service
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/computer-misuse-act
Source snippet
It also provides guidance on offences relating to the collection, processing, and st...
7.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/reconsidering-prosecution-decision
Source snippet
Reconsidering a Prosecution Decision | The Crown Prosecution ServiceJanuary 25, 2023 — RECONSIDERING A PROSECUTION DECISION Updated: 26 F...
Published: January 25, 2023
8.
Source: cps.gov.uk
Link:https://www.cps.gov.uk/prosecution-guidance/cybercrime-prosecution-guidance
9.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Title: JUSTIC E DEPT. SAYS MICROSOFT IN CONTEMPT
Link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1997/12/18/justice-dept-says-microsoft-in-contempt/ee795b85-f515-4dee-84f7-7d75141bfa72/
10.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Title: MAINFRAME D: COMPUTERS BECOME A WEAPON IN OFFICE WARFARE
Link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/10/11/mainframed-computers-become-a-weapon-in-office-warfare/fc576422-b41e-4d80-a126-6a7ef785332b/
11.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Title: 3 CHARGED IN N.Y. IN PAGER SCHEME
Link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/business/1997/08/28/3-charged-in-ny-in-pager-scheme/27296619-f900-4fd2-94f1-997ef00d0a3e/
12.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Title: Opinion | SPEECH, NETS AND MIRRORS
Link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/opinions/1997/07/04/speech-nets-and-mirrors/0e45e975-9b12-477e-82f4-58f952413513/
13.
Source: washingtonpost.com
Title: DISMISSA L OF INTERNET CASE AFFIRMED
Link:https://www.washingtonpost.com/archive/politics/1997/01/30/dismissal-of-internet-case-affirmed/5b132741-42b8-4043-863a-fdd8448fd499/
Additional References
14.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary Mc Kinnon?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImdnvQx7sQ
Source snippet
Gary McKinnon will not face prosecution in the UK...
15.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon will not face prosecution in the UK
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=viLcoe_xPMU
Source snippet
Theresa May blocks Gary McKinnon's extradition to US...
16.
Source: youtube.com
Title: UK hacker’s extradition to US blocked
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=v4Js8DF80HY
Source snippet
Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary McKinnon?...
17.
Source: kujimedia.com
Title: Kuji Media Corporation Ltd. » Blog Archive » THE SCHOOLBOY SPY. Sunday Times
Link:https://www.kujimedia.com/the-schoolboy-spy-sunday-times/
18.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Theresa May blocks Gary Mc Kinnon’s extradition to US
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5MEQVo8ENC8
Source snippet
Gary McKinnon wins extradition battle...
19.
Source: youtube.com
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon wins extradition battle
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=y4lecD44F5E
Source snippet
UK hacker's extradition to US blocked...
20.
Source: hansard.parliament.uk
Title: uk Discontinued Prosecutions
Link:https://hansard.parliament.uk/Commons/1999-04-22/debates/557e31a5-f03d-4532-ab4a-9c04f639f15e/DiscontinuedProsecutions
21.
Source: hansard.parliament.uk
Title: uk Discontinued Prosecutions
Link:https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2004-03-15/debates/9655592f-265e-43b0-aec9-8d6922f88b9e/DiscontinuedProsecutions
22.
Source: publications.parliament.uk
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200809/cmhansrd/cm090715/debtext/90715-0012.htm
23.
Source: api.parliament.uk
Title: discontinued prosecutions
Link:https://api.parliament.uk/historic-hansard/written-answers/2004/mar/15/discontinued-prosecutions