Branchoria UFO Hackers UFO Hackers

Documented cyber intrusions, disputed discoveries, and the evidence gaps between them.

Within UFO Hackers

What Could 'Non Terrestrial Officers' Mean?

A phrase recalled from an unseen document has fueled secret-space-force theories despite the absence of metadata or an authenticated copy.

130 sources 3 graphics
Preview for What Could 'Non Terrestrial Officers' Mean?

On this page

  • How Mc Kinnon described the document
  • Secret space interpretations
  • Mundane meanings and missing context

Introduction

The “Non-Terrestrial Officers” document is the most frequently repeated—and most easily overstated—part of Gary McKinnon’s account of hacking into United States military networks. McKinnon said he encountered an Excel spreadsheet bearing that title, listing names and ranks of US Air Force personnel alongside references to unfamiliar ships and personnel transfers. He interpreted the material as possible evidence of a covert military organisation operating beyond Earth.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundJun 21, 2006 — One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air F…

Overview image for Officers List

No copy of the spreadsheet, screenshot, filename, network path or list of names has been made public. Its existence and contents therefore rest on McKinnon’s recollection rather than on a recoverable document. Even he acknowledged that the spreadsheet might have described an exercise, simulation or other conventional activity.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

The central issue is consequently not whether the phrase sounds extraordinary, but whether there is enough surviving evidence to determine what the spreadsheet was, where it came from and what its terminology meant. At present, there is not.

What McKinnon said was on the spreadsheet

McKinnon first described the discovery publicly in a 2005 Guardian interview. He recalled finding a list of officers’ names under the heading “Non-Terrestrial Officers” while exploring a system associated with US Space Command. When asked what the phrase meant, he interpreted it as referring to people who were not based on Earth.[The Guardian]theguardian.comIn 1983, when Gary McKinnon was 17, he went to see the movie WarGames at his local cinema in Crouch End, north London…. Last month he…

His more detailed account appeared in a 2006 Wired interview. There, he described an Excel spreadsheet containing:

  • names and military ranks;[wired.com]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundJun 21, 2006 — One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air F…
  • people he regarded as US Air Force personnel;
  • officers whom he said he could not locate in other records;
  • references to transfers between ships;
  • ship names he did not recognise from the publicly known fleet.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundJun 21, 2006 — One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air F…

These elements became fused in later retellings into the idea of an “off-world personnel roster” or a manifest for a secret space fleet. That conclusion goes further than McKinnon’s original description. He did not report seeing the words “extraterrestrial”, “alien”, “space fleet” or “Solar Warden” in the spreadsheet. Nor did he identify any destination, planet, spacecraft type or organisation explicitly described as operating outside Earth. His inference depended primarily on the title, the unfamiliar names and the apparent transfer terminology.

The claimed document should also be distinguished from McKinnon’s separate story about viewing an unusual NASA image. The spreadsheet was reportedly found among military records, whereas the image was said to have been viewed through a NASA system. Combining them into a single “NASA alien file” blurs two different claims and makes the surviving account appear more coherent than the original evidence permits.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

Officers List illustration 1

The document itself has never surfaced

The decisive weakness is the absence of the file. McKinnon did not release the spreadsheet, reproduce its contents or provide a complete list of its entries. No journalist, investigator or independent technical examiner is known to have authenticated a copy.

McKinnon’s computers were seized after his arrest, and he said one hard drive was sent to the United States. Yet no publicly available prosecution record identifies a recovered “Non-Terrestrial Officers” spreadsheet or confirms that such a file was found among the data he accessed or copied. The US indictment documents unauthorised access to Army, Navy, Air Force, Department of Defense and NASA computers, but it concentrates on intrusion methods, affected systems and alleged damage rather than confirming the UFO-related material McKinnon later described.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92…

That silence is not proof that the spreadsheet never existed. Criminal indictments are not inventories of every file viewed by an intruder, and officials would not necessarily discuss sensitive material publicly. It does mean, however, that the confirmed legal case supplies no independent support for McKinnon’s interpretation.

The missing file also prevents elementary verification. Researchers cannot examine its metadata, worksheet tabs, abbreviations, organisational codes, creation date or surrounding directory. They cannot check whether the names belonged to real officers, fictional exercise participants, contractors, astronauts, satellite controllers or people assigned to classified but terrestrial programmes. They cannot even establish whether “Non-Terrestrial Officers” was the formal title of a record, an informal heading added by one employee or wording McKinnon reconstructed from memory.

“Non-terrestrial” does not necessarily mean alien

The phrase is striking because ordinary readers often treat “non-terrestrial” as synonymous with “extraterrestrial”. In government, aerospace and communications language, however, it can simply mean something situated above or operating away from the Earth’s surface.

Modern technical literature uses “non-terrestrial networks” for communications involving satellites, high-altitude platforms and airborne systems. Such terminology distinguishes spaceborne or aerial infrastructure from ground-based networks without implying alien origin.[arXiv]arxiv.orgarXiv A briefA brief introduction to satellite communications for Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN)May 8, 2023…Published: May 8, 2023

A military spreadsheet could therefore have used “non-terrestrial” to distinguish personnel associated with orbital operations, satellite systems, space surveillance, exercises or simulated commands from personnel assigned to conventional ground units. That would still be interesting, particularly in the early 2000s, when US military planning increasingly emphasised space as an operational domain. It would not by itself demonstrate a secret extraterrestrial presence.

Other ordinary possibilities include:

  • Personnel not assigned to a terrestrial command. The heading may have referred to officers attached to space-based missions, satellite operations or a planning cell.
  • Exercise or simulation data. Military exercises frequently use invented units, vessels and personnel to avoid confusing scenarios with real operational records.
  • A planning concept. The spreadsheet may have modelled future space operations rather than described an existing fleet.
  • A local or informal classification. An employee may have created a descriptive label that had no official meaning outside one office.
  • A database-reconciliation problem. McKinnon’s inability to locate the names elsewhere would have depended on the public sources and search methods available to him at the time.

Wired directly raised the possibility that the material belonged to a military game or hypothetical scenario. McKinnon did not rule that out, replying that it was difficult to know for certain. That concession is important because it shows that the most famous extraordinary interpretation was not presented even by its source as a settled conclusion.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

The unfamiliar “ships” add ambiguity, not confirmation

References to ship-to-ship transfers are often presented as the document’s second major clue. According to McKinnon, the spreadsheet contained ship names that he did not recognise from known naval records. In later UFO accounts, these became spacecraft operating as part of a hidden fleet.[WIRED]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundJun 21, 2006 — One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air F…

The wording does not establish that. “Ship” can refer to naval vessels, spacecraft, support craft or fictional platforms in an exercise. Unfamiliar names could belong to classified vessels, foreign units, proposed platforms, computer-generated entities or aliases used in training. Without the actual entries, the claim cannot be tested against naval registers, spaceflight records or exercise documentation.

The relationship between the two parts of the spreadsheet is also unclear. McKinnon’s interviews do not establish whether the officer list and transfer information appeared on the same worksheet, on separate tabs within one workbook or merely among several spreadsheets accessed during the same session. This detail matters because later summaries often depict a single integrated manifest containing officers, spacecraft and movements. The surviving contemporary account is less precise: it reports a spreadsheet title, names and ranks, and transfer information, but not the record’s full structure.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

Similarly, the phrase is sometimes transformed from “ship-to-ship transfers” into “fleet-to-fleet transfers”. The latter wording sounds more like a large organised space navy, but McKinnon’s widely cited Wired interview used “ship-to-ship”. Treating every later variant as exact risks building an elaborate narrative from language that has shifted in repetition.

Why the officers could not be checked

McKinnon said the listed Air Force personnel were “not registered anywhere else”, but he did not explain a comprehensive verification method. In the early 2000s, there was no complete public database of all serving US military personnel and assignments. Classified posts, intelligence work, temporary duties, name variations and incomplete online records would all make an officer difficult to identify.

Even possessing the names would not automatically resolve the issue. A person’s absence from public search results would not show that the person was fictitious or stationed off-world. Conversely, identifying some names as real space-operations personnel would not necessarily validate the more extraordinary interpretation; it might instead support a conventional explanation involving satellite or orbital work.

The absence of the names is therefore especially damaging. It eliminates the most obvious route to corroboration. Researchers cannot compare ranks, service histories, assignments or organisational affiliations, nor determine whether the claimed entries followed genuine Air Force personnel formats.

This creates a fundamental evidence problem: McKinnon’s interpretation partly depended on unsuccessful searches, but neither the original search terms nor the underlying names are available for replication.

Officers List illustration 2

What later official reviews do—and do not—tell us

The US government’s modern investigations of unidentified anomalous phenomena have not authenticated McKinnon’s spreadsheet. The Department of Defense’s All-domain Anomaly Resolution Office, or AARO, reported in 2024 that it had found no verifiable evidence that the US government or private industry possessed extraterrestrial technology, and no evidence that reported government programmes represented hidden extraterrestrial exploitation efforts.[U.S. Department of War]defense.govOpen source on defense.gov.

NASA likewise states that it has found no credible evidence of extraterrestrial life and no evidence that unidentified anomalous phenomena have an extraterrestrial origin. Its independent UAP study has stressed that reliable conclusions require better-quality, reproducible data.[NASA Science]science.nasa.govScience UAP FAQsScience UAP FAQs

These findings weigh against using McKinnon’s recollection as proof of an off-world military organisation. They do not amount to a line-by-line investigation of his alleged spreadsheet, and neither NASA nor AARO has publicly demonstrated what the phrase meant in the specific file he described. The proper conclusion is therefore narrower: no official review has supplied the missing corroboration needed to elevate the account beyond testimony.

An institutional denial alone would not settle the question for readers who suspect a cover-up. More persuasive would be recoverable evidence: the workbook, forensic records showing its location, testimony from its author, or matching documentation from an independent archive. None has entered the public record.

How the story grew beyond McKinnon’s account

The document acquired a larger mythology as websites, videos and social-media posts linked it to a purported secret programme commonly called “Solar Warden”. That name is now frequently presented as though McKinnon read it in the files. His major early interviews about the spreadsheet do not report seeing that term.[The Guardian]theguardian.comIn 1983, when Gary McKinnon was 17, he went to see the movie WarGames at his local cinema in Crouch End, north London…. Last month he…

This is an example of narrative accretion: an initial claim contains ambiguous details, later commentators supply a proposed explanation, and the explanation is eventually repeated as part of the original discovery. In this case:

America's Secret Space Program and the Alien Connection: Solar Warden

Channel: The Why Files

Open on YouTube

  1. McKinnon said he saw the heading “Non-Terrestrial Officers”.
  2. He associated it with unfamiliar personnel and ships.
  3. He speculated about space-based military operations.
  4. Later sources attached named secret fleets, detailed missions and extraterrestrial alliances.
  5. Those additions were then used to “confirm” the initial interpretation.

The process makes the story more detailed without making its evidential foundation stronger. Details introduced years later cannot substitute for the absent spreadsheet, particularly when they are not traceable to McKinnon’s earliest accounts.

McKinnon’s own wording was more guarded than many retellings. Although he plainly favoured an off-world interpretation, he admitted uncertainty and accepted that the document might have been connected to a game or hypothetical plan.[WIRED]wired.comUFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundHe claims to have discovered a NASA department that airbrushes UFO images from high-resolution photos and an Excel spreadsheet titled "No…

A balanced credibility assessment

The claim has one genuine point in its favour: McKinnon unquestionably obtained unauthorised access to numerous US government computers. The intrusion was serious enough to produce a federal indictment and extended extradition proceedings, so his assertion that he viewed military files cannot be dismissed merely because the access sounds implausible.[Department of Justice]justice.govDepartment of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud…Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92…

That confirmed access does not authenticate every remembered discovery. The evidential chain breaks at the document itself.

What is reasonably established

  • McKinnon penetrated US military and NASA systems.
  • He publicly described a heading reading “Non-Terrestrial Officers” by 2005.
  • His broad description remained recognisable in subsequent interviews.
  • He associated the file with names, ranks and transfers involving unfamiliar ships.[The Guardian]theguardian.comIn 1983, when Gary McKinnon was 17, he went to see the movie WarGames at his local cinema in Crouch End, north London…. Last month he…

What remains unverified

  • Whether the spreadsheet title was remembered exactly.
  • Which computer or organisation hosted it.
  • Whether it was authentic operational data.
  • Who the listed officers were.
  • Whether the vessels were real, fictional, proposed or coded.
  • Whether “non-terrestrial” referred to orbital duties, a simulation or something more extraordinary.
  • Whether any part of the document indicated extraterrestrial beings or technology.

On that record, the document is best classified as an uncorroborated eyewitness claim arising from a confirmed computer intrusion. It is more substantial than a wholly anonymous internet rumour because the claimant is identifiable and demonstrably accessed government systems. It is much weaker than documentary evidence because the underlying data cannot be inspected, reproduced or independently interpreted.

Officers List illustration 3

What would change the assessment

A credible breakthrough would require more than another retelling. The most valuable evidence would be the original spreadsheet or a forensic copy retaining metadata and its directory context. Failing that, investigators would need contemporaneous notes, police seizure records identifying the file, named witnesses who created or used it, or independently obtained records reproducing its distinctive contents.

Useful corroboration would answer concrete questions:

  • What was the exact filename and worksheet title?
  • On which military network, server and directory was it stored?
  • What were the names and ranks?[wired.com]wired.comufo hacker tells what he foundWIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundJun 21, 2006 — One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air F…
  • What terminology described the ships and transfers?
  • Did the workbook contain exercise labels, classification markings or project codes?
  • Who authored or last modified it?
  • Were the entries operational, hypothetical or administrative?

Without answers of this kind, the phrase remains evocative but indeterminate. It may have been an unusual label for human space personnel, a planning document, an exercise artefact, an informal spreadsheet—or something not yet adequately explained. What it cannot presently bear is the confident claim that McKinnon uncovered a verified roster of officers serving in a secret extraterrestrial fleet.

The lasting lesson of the document

The “Non-Terrestrial Officers” story endures because it combines a verified breach with an unverifiable discovery. The first fact lends credibility to the possibility that McKinnon saw sensitive information; the absence of the second object leaves almost unlimited room for interpretation.

Its importance within the history of UFO-motivated hacking is therefore less as proof of a concealed space force than as a demonstration of how ambiguous digital material can become folklore once removed from its technical setting. A spreadsheet title, unfamiliar names and unexplained transfers might have been highly revealing in context. Stripped of the file, metadata and surrounding records, they are clues without a stable meaning.

The most defensible reading keeps both sides in view: McKinnon may accurately have remembered an oddly titled military spreadsheet, but the public evidence does not establish that its officers were extraterrestrial, stationed beyond Earth or connected to a secret space fleet.

Amazon book picks

Further Reading

Books and field guides related to What Could 'Non Terrestrial Officers' Mean?. Use these as the next step if you want deeper reading beyond the article.

Browse more on Amazon:UFOs: Generals, Pilots, and Government Officials Go on the RecordThe UFO Experience: A Scientific InquiryUFOs and Government: A Historical Inquiry

As an Amazon Associate I earn from qualifying purchases.

eBay marketplace picks

Marketplace Samples

Live-tested eBay searches with available results related to this page.

UsingUSA

Selected fromUFO poster oneBay.co.uk.

Browse more oneBay.co.uk

Example items shown for inspiration; availability and pricing can change. Branchoria may earn a commission if you purchase through outbound eBay links.

Endnotes

1. Source: wired.com
Title: ufo hacker tells what he found
Link:https://www.wired.com/2006/06/ufo-hacker-tells-what-he-found/

Source snippet

WIRED'UFO Hacker' Tells What He FoundJun 21, 2006 — One was titled "Non-Terrestrial Officers." It contained names and ranks of U.S. Air F...

3. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/criminal/cybercrime/press-releases/2002/mckinnonIndict.htm

Source snippet

Department of JusticeLondon, England Hacker Indicted Under Computer Fraud...Gary McKinnon accessed and damaged without authorization 92...

4. Source: arxiv.org
Title: arXiv A brief
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2305.04590

Source snippet

A brief introduction to satellite communications for Non-Terrestrial Networks (NTN)May 8, 2023...

Published: May 8, 2023

5. Source: arxiv.org
Link:https://arxiv.org/abs/2207.10385

6. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3701297/dod-report-discounts-sightings-of-extraterrestrial-technology/

7. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3702219/media-engagement-with-acting-aaro-director-tim-phillips-on-the-historical-recor/

8. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/Releases/Release/Article/3700894/statement-by-pentagon-press-secretary-maj-gen-pat-ryder-on-the-historical-recor/

9. Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: Science UAP FAQs
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/faqs/

10. Source: nasa.gov
Title: UPDATE: NASA Shares UAP Independent Study Report; Names Director
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/update-nasa-shares-uap-independent-study-report-names-director/

11. Source: astrobiology.nasa.gov
Title: ask an astrobiologist
Link:https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/ask-an-astrobiologist/

12. Source: science.nasa.gov
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/uap/

13. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/

14. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006159/dvpmoduleid/77396/

15. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3965403/dod-examining-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena/

16. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/Trans/Tran/Article/3702062/pentagon-press-secretary-air-force-maj-gen-pat-ryder-holds-a-press-briefing/

17. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/Today-in-DOD/Date/2024-03-08/

18. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/988676/dvpcc/false/

19. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/Article/3575511/dod-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-office-launches-new-reporting-tool/

20. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/Transcripts/Transcript/Article/3575588/aaro-director-dr-sean-kirkpatrick-holds-an-off-camera-media-roundtable/

21. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A to Release, Discuss Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Report
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-release-discuss-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-report/

22. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/videoid/885190/

23. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Provides Coverage of Unidentified Anomalous Phenomena Meeting
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-provides-coverage-of-unidentified-anomalous-phenomena-meeting/

24. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/News/News-Stories/Article/article/3368109/dod-working-to-better-understand-resolve-anomalous-phenomena/

25. Source: defense.gov
Link:https://www.defense.gov/Multimedia/Videos/videoid/880270/

26. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A Announces Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Team Members
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/general/nasa-announces-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-team-members/

27. Source: astrobiology.nasa.gov
Link:https://astrobiology.nasa.gov/about/

28. Source: nasa.gov
Title: NAS A to Discuss New Unidentified Aerial Phenomena Study Today
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/news-release/nasa-to-discuss-new-unidentified-aerial-phenomena-study-today/

29. Source: madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil
Link:https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/402-the-light-on-the-hill-america-and-non-terrestrial-war/

30. Source: madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil
Title: mil399. The Most Consequential Adversaries – Mad Scientist Laboratory
Link:https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/399-the-most-consequential-adversaries/

31. Source: army.mil
Title: The Civilian Education System and Total Army Readiness
Link:https://www.army.mil/article-amp/256818/the_civilian_education_system_and_total_army_readiness

32. Source: nasa.gov
Title: Do Aliens Exist? We Asked a NASA Scientist: Episode 5
Link:https://www.nasa.gov/solar-system/planets/mars/do-aliens-exist-we-asked-a-nasa-scientist-episode-5/

33. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006093/dvpcc/false/

34. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/videoid/1006094/dvpcc/false/

35. Source: madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil
Title: mil155. “The Queue” – Mad Scientist Laboratory
Link:https://madsciblog.tradoc.army.mil/155-the-queue/

36. Source: science.nasa.gov
Title: what we knowand dont knowabout oumuamua
Link:https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/what-we-knowand-dont-knowabout-oumuamua/

37. Source: ntrs.nasa.gov
Link:https://ntrs.nasa.gov/citations/19740054999

38. Source: justice.gov
Link:https://www.justice.gov/archive/usao/nj/Press/files/pdffiles/Older/edva_mckinnon_indictment.pdf

39. Source: pclt.defense.gov
Title: OSDJS Article List
Link:https://pclt.defense.gov/DIRECTORATES/Privacy-and-Civil-Liberties-Directorate/Privacy/SORNsIndex/DOD-Component-Notices/OSDJS-Article-List/

40. Source: tioh.army.mil
Link:https://tioh.army.mil/Catalog/PageFlow.aspx?CategoryId=5943&grp=1&menu=Uniformed+Services

41. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/

42. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/FAQ/

43. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Next-Submit-a-Report-dup/

44. Source: aaro.mil
Title: Congressional Press Products
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Congressional-Press-Products/

45. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/UAP-Cases/Official-UAP-Imagery/4/

46. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Resources/Historical-Record-Reports/Volume-II/

47. Source: aaro.mil
Link:https://www.aaro.mil/Next-AARO-Home-redesign/Next-Parent/Presidential-UAP-Transparency-Initiative/dvpmoduleid/77396/dvpsearch/searchstring/

48. Source: history.com
Title: episode 9
Link:https://www.history.com/shows/ancient-aliens/season-10/episode-9

49. Source: navair.navy.mil
Link:https://www.navair.navy.mil/osbp/node/6891

50. Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/theguardian/2005/jul/09/weekend7.weekend2

Source snippet

In 1983, when Gary McKinnon was 17, he went to see the movie WarGames at his local cinema in Crouch End, north London.... Last month he...

51. Source: theguardian.com
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2008/jul/27/internationalcrime.hacking

52. Source: theguardian.com
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon | Life and style | The Guardian
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/theobserver/2007/apr/22/features.magazine7

53. Source: projectcamelot.org
Title: gary mckinnon
Link:https://projectcamelot.org/gary_mckinnon.html

54. Source: Wikipedia
Title: Gary Mc Kinnon
Link:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gary_McKinnon

55. Source: theguardian.com
Title: film scottish hacker gary mckinnon fight against us extradition
Link:https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/nov/29/film-scottish-hacker-gary-mckinnon-fight-against-us-extradition

56. Source: GOV.UK
Title: latest on [gary mckinnon case]({{ ‘mc-kinnon-case/’ | relative_url }})
Link:https://www.gov.uk/government/news/latest-on-gary-mckinnon-case

Additional References

57. Source: youtube.com
Title: America’s Secret Space Program and the Alien Connection: Solar Warden
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sfRcl5rmydI

Source snippet

Gary McKinnon Non-Terrestrial Officers Claims This video detailedly explores Gary McKinnon's assertions regarding non-terrestrial officer...

58. Source: publications.parliament.uk
Title: UK Parliament House of Lords
Link:https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/ld200708/ldjudgmt/jd080730/mckinn-1.htm

Source snippet

UK ParliamentHouse of Lords - Mckinnon V Government of The United...30 Jul 2008 — On 7 October 2004 the respondent government requested...

Published: October 2004

59. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6Ka4l7jdeQw

Source snippet

America's Secret Space Program and the Alien Connection: Solar Warden...

60. Source: youtube.com
Title: Hacking for UFOs and fighting for his life. Who is Gary Mc Kinnon?
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OImdnvQx7sQ

Source snippet

Ancient Aliens: Hacking NASA Secrets (Season 12, Episode 9) | History...

61. Source: youtube.com
Link:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5afwWUYWVQ

Source snippet

The Most Dangerous File the Hacker Found on NASA Servers... (Aliens?!)...

62. Source: af.mil
Link:https://www.af.mil/News/Article-Display/Article/118124/a-10-unit-marks-10000-flight-hours-2500-sorties-in-6-month-tour-in-afghanistan/

63. Source: facebook.com
Link:https://www.facebook.com/OriginsExplained/videos/david-grusch-nasa-hacker-gary-mckinnon-the-alien-cover-up-is-real/1000575392635681/

64. Source: instagram.com
Link:https://www.instagram.com/reel/DUBxlUbCCtE/

65. Source: podmust.com
Link:https://podmust.com/ep/?epis=R2FyeSBNY0tpbm5vbjogVGhlIEhhY2tlciBXaG8gRm91bmQgTkFTQSdzIFVGTyAmIE5vbi1UZXJyZXN0cmlhbCBPZmZpY2Vycw%3D%3D&podcast=the-daily-conspiracy

66. Source: reddit.com
Link:https://www.reddit.com/r/UFOs/comments/16uujkn/gary_mckinnon_talks_about_finding_the/